Disposed

M.Ganesan v. the Superintendent of Police

Madras HC6 Jun 2016CRL OP/9606/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal original petition under Section 482 CrPC, the petitioner sought direction to register a case based on his complaint. The High Court directed the petitioner to cooperate with the ongoing police enquiry and instructed the police to register a case if a cognizable offence is made out, citing Lalita Kumari.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to cooperate with enquiry; police directed to register case if cognizable offence made out or close petition.

M.Ganesan Vs the Superintendent of Police — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 06.06.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH

¶5

Crl.OP.No.9606 of 2016

¶6

M.Ganesan ... Petitioner

¶7

Vs
1.The Superintendent of Police,
O/O. The Superintendent of Police,
Vellore District.
2.The Inspector of Police,
Ranipet Police Station,
Vellore District. ... Respondents
Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure to direct the respondent to
register a case on the petitioner's complaint dated
12.10.2015, investigate the same and to file charge sheet.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.N.Nagarathinam
For Respondents : Mr.C.Emalias
Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER

¶8

Seeking a direction to the respondent to register a case on the petitioner's complaint dated 12.10.2015, investigate the same and to file charge sheet, the petitioner has come up with this petition.

¶9

2.Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents submitted that based on the complaint lodged by the petitioner, the petition enquiry is pending before the 2^nd respondent. He further submitted that the petitioner did not co-operate with the investigation.

¶10

3.Recording the submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the petitioner is directed to co-operate with the enquiry. The respondent police is also directed to conduct enquiry expeditiously and during the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, a regular https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ case shall be registered, following the decision laid down by

¶11

the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttarpradesh and Others reported in (2014) 2 SCC 1, otherwise, the petition may be closed under due intimation to the petitioner.

¶12

With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.

¶13

Sd/-

¶14

Assistant Registrar(CS VI)

¶15

//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
mps
To
1.The Superintendent of Police,
O/O. The Superintendent of Police,
Vellore District.
2.The Inspector of Police,
Ranipet Police Station,
Vellore District.
3.The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Chennai.
+1cc to Mr.A.N.Nagarathinam, Advocate, S.R.No.30044
Crl.OP.No.9606 of 2016
EV(CO)
CA(17/06/2016)

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Ganesan v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Ganesan v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Kothandraraman Vs the Superintendent of Police

Raman Vs the Deputy Superintendent of

M.Balasubramaniam Vs State Rep. by

Seetha Vs the Commissioner of Police

P. Kannan, S/O. Palanisamy, Vs State Rep. by Its the

K.Thangamani Vs State Rep. by