K.Murugesan v. State by
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court directed the petitioner to appear in person before the Superintendent of Police and lodge a fresh complaint instead of relying on a complaint sent by post.
What did the court decide?
A direction for the petitioner to appear in person before the second respondent police to lodge a fresh complaint.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27.06.2016
Coram:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH
Crl.O.P.No.9153 of 2016
K.Murugesan ... Petitioner
Vs.
State by
1.The Assistant Commissioner of Police,
Taramani (Sub-Division)
Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai-41.
2.The Inspector of Police,
Thiruvanmiyur Police Station,
Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai – 41. ... Respondents
Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure praying to direct the second
respondent to register the complaint dated 12.04.2016 and file a
final report.
For Petitioner : Mr.J.Pachiyappan
For Respondents : Mr.C. Emalias
Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the second respondent to register the complaint dated 12.04.2016, given by the petitioner.
- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent, who would submit that the complaint dated 12.04.2016 has been sent by post to the Commissioner of Police, Chennai.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K. Murugesan
- respondent
State by the Inspector of Police, Thiruvanmiyur Police Station
Coram
P.N. Prakash
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court