Remanded

V.Madhan Kumar v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC24 Jun 2016CRL OP/13117/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner seeks direction to police to recover pledged gold chain as stolen property. Court allows temporary stay on previous order and directs petitioner to file prayer under Section 451 Cr.P.C. for interim custody while Magistrate hears all parties.

What did the court decide?

Directed petitioner to file application under Section 451 Cr.P.C. with Judicial Magistrate for interim custody of gold chain; Magistrate to pass appropriate orders after hearing all parties.

V.Madhan Kumar Vs the Inspector of Police — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 24.06.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH

¶5

CRL.OP.No.13117 of 2016

¶6

V.Madhan Kumar ...Petitioner Vs 1.The Inspector of Police, B1 Police Station, Big Bazaar Street, Coimbatore. 2.Muthoot FinCorp Limited, Oppanakara Street, Coimbatore Rep. By its Branch Manager V.Ravindran S/o.V.Vadivel ...Respondents Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to direct the 1^st respondent to seize the property in P.R.Nos.383 & 635/2014 vide Receipt No.6098 from the 2^nd respondent in C.C.No.304 of 2014 on the file of Judicial Magistrate V, Coimbatore and handed over the same to the petitioner.

¶7

For Petitioner :Mr.I.Abrar MD Abdullah For Respondent :Mr.C.Emalias No.1 Additional Public Prosecutor

¶8

O R D E R

¶9

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the 1^st respondent to seize the property in P.R.Nos.383 & 635/2014 vide Receipt No.6098 from the 2^nd respondent in C.C.No.304 of 2014 on the file of Judicial Magistrate No.V, Coimbatore and hand over the same to the petitioner.

¶10

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the first respondent.

¶11

On the complaint lodged by the petitioner, the first https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ respondent police registered a case in Crime No.207 of 2014

¶12

for offence under Section 381 IPC and after completing the investigation, filed the final report before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Coimbatore, in C.C.No.304 of 2014 against one Chandrasekaran and A.Shansa and the case is now pending.

¶13

It is the case of the petitioner that he is the owner of the Jewellery shop and that, Chandrasekaran and Shansa were employees under him and they had stolen 300 gms Gold Jewellery, pursuant to which, the aforesaid FIR was registered. The accused were arrested and substantial portion of the jewellery was recovered and handed over to the petitioner under Section 451 Cr.P.C. While so, it appears that a Gold Chain weighing 40 grams was pledged by Chandrasekaran with Muthoot FinCorp Limited, Oppanakara Street, Coimbatore, under receipt No.6098 and the said Chandrasekaran has received a sum of Rs.75,000/-. Muthoot FinCorp Limited has accepted the Gold Chain on the bonafide plea that Chandrasekaran is the owner of it and granted Jewellery loan.

¶14

Now, it appears that there are prima facie materials to show that the Gold Chain is a stolen property and therefore, Muthoot FinCorp Limited cannot have a better title than that of the accused. The first respondent police filed a petition in Crl.MP.No.4234 of 2014 under Section 91 of Cr.P.C in Crime No.207 of 2014, based on which, the learned Judicial Magistrate has passed a very detailed and reasoned order dated 02.09.2014, by which, the property has been produced before the learned Judicial Magistrate and has been temporarily given custody to Muthoot FinCrop Limited. No notice was ordered to the petitioner in Crl.M.P.No.4234 of 2014. Hence, he is before this Court.

¶15

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the view that it will serve the interest of justice, if the petitioner is given an opportunity to file an application under Section 451 Cr.P.C before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Coimbatore and on such filing, the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V is directed to pass appropriate orders with regard to the interim custody of gold chain to the petitioner, after hearing Muthoot FinCorp Limited and the state.

¶16

The learned Judicial Magistrate No.V is directed to pass appropriate orders on the petition without being influenced by the earlier order dated 02.09.2014 in Crl.M.P.No.4234 of 2014. The order under Section 451 Cr.P.C is not final and it is open to the Court to change custody in appropriate cases.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

With the above direction, this criminal original petition is closed and the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V is directed to dispose of the petition to be filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks of the date of filing.

¶19

Sd/-
Asst.Registrar
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
sms
To
1.The Inspector of Police,
B1 Police Station, Big Bazaar Street,
Coimbatore.
2.The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
3.The Judicial Magistrate - V,
Coimbatore.
4. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Coimbatore.
+ 1 CC to Mr.I.Abrar Md. Abdullah, Advocate SR NO 35204
CRL.OP.No.13117 of 2016
RV[CO]
GP/19.7.

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

V.Madhan Kumar v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Madhan Kumar v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lakshmi Vs the Inspector of Police

M.Balakrishnan Vs the Inspector of Police

R.S. Rajashekar, Vs State Rep. by Its the Deputy

Arumugam Vs the Superintendent of Police

Rajeshkumar Vs the Inspector of Police

A.Elayaraja Vs the Inspector of Police