Disposed

K.Rajendran v. the Superintendent of Police

Madras HC18 Feb 2016CRL OP/91/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court, in a Criminal Original Petition under Section 482 CrPC, granted a direction to the Superintendent of Police to depute a Deputy Superintendent of Police to supervise the investigation in Cr. No. 523 of 2015 pending on the file of the Police Station Inspector.

What did the court decide?

The First Respondent was directed to depute the jurisdictional Deputy Superintendent of Police to supervise the investigation done by the Second Respondent.

K.Rajendran Vs the Superintendent of Police — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 18.02.2016

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R.MALA

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.91 of 2016

¶6

K.Rajendran .. Petitioner

¶7

Vs.
1. The Superintendent of Police,
Namakkal District,
Namakkal.
2. The Inspector of Police,
Paramathi Velur Police Station,
Namakkal District,
Cr.No.523/2015. .. Respondent

¶8

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the first respondent to transfer the investigation of the case in Cr.No.523 of 2015 on the file of the second respondent to some other investigation officer under the control of the first respondent for fair and further investigation based on the petitioner's representation in the form of complaint made to the first respondent on 21.11.2015.

¶9

The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction to the first respondent to transfer the investigation of the case in Cr.No.523 of 2015 on the file of the second respondent to some other investigation officer under the control of the first respondent for fair and further investigation based on the petitioner's representation in the form of complaint made to the first respondent on 21.11.2015.

¶10

2.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner dated 16.11.2015, a case was registered by the second respondent in Crime No.523 of 2015 for the offence under Section 381 of IPC as

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

against one Suresh and investigation is going on. He further submits that during the pendency of the investigation, the petitioner has made another representation to the first respondent on 21.11.2015 to include some more accused as parties to the proceedings. Since the respondents have not taken any action, the petitioner has come forward with this petition for the above stated relief.

¶13

3.Heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

¶14

4.Considering the submissions made on both sides, since the offence is under Section 381 IPC, a direction is given to the first respondent to depute the jurisdictional Deputy Superintendent of Police to supervise the investigation done by the second respondent.

¶15

With the above direction, the Criminal Original Petition
is disposed of.
cla
s/d-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To
1. The Superintendent of Police,
Namakkal District,
Namakkal.
2. The Inspector of Police,
Paramathi Velur Police Station,
Namakkal District,
Cr.No.523/2015.
3. The Public Prosecutor
High Court, Chennai.
+ 1 cc to Mr.K.Kannan, Advocate SR 10426
sk(co)
prk27/2 Crl.O.P.No.91 of 2016

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Rajendran v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Rajendran v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Sub Inspector of Police, Vs S. Bhuvaneswari

Senthamarai Vs the Inspector of Police

A.Kanniyappan Vs the Inspector of Police

Paulchidadurai Vs the Commissioner of Police

R.K.Balusamy Vs the Superintendent of Police

Creature Export Firm Rep. by Vs C. Kesavan