Disposed

Kulasekaran v. State Rep by

Madras HC6 Apr 2016CRL OP/7798/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal original petition filed under Section 482 CrPC, the petitioner prayed for police investigation and a final report. The court directed the respondent to complete the investigation and submit the final report within three months from the date of receiving a copy of this order.

What did the court decide?

Direction to complete investigation within three months and file a final report.

Kulasekaran Vs State Rep by — Madras HC (2016) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 06.04.2016

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.7798 of 2016

¶6

Kulasekaran ... Petitioner

¶7

Vs.

¶8

State represented by Sub Inspector of Police Roshanai Police Station, Tindivanam – 604 001 Villupuram District Crime No.218 of 2015 ... Respondent

¶9

Prayer :

¶10

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to direct the respondent above case in Crime No.218 of 2015 to investigate and to file a final report under sections 147, 294(b), 427, 445, 453, 506(i) of I.P.C. against Selvam, his daughter namely Hemavathy, his son and his son-in-law.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Balakrishnan For Respondent : Mr.C.Emalias Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER

¶12

The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking a direction to the respondent police to investigate the case in Crime No.218 of 2015 and to file final report.

¶13

2.Heard the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on either side.

¶14

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner dated 30.04.2015, a case has been registered in Crime No.218 of 2015 for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 294(b), 427, 445, 453, 506(ii) I.P.C. However, the respondent has not shown any interest to investigate the matter and lay a final report. Hence, the petitioner has come up with the present petition for the relief as stated above.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

4.Resisting the same, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that investigation is going on and hence, he prays for three months time to complete the investigation and file a final report.

¶17

5.Considering the submissions made on both sides, the respondent is directed to complete the investigation in Crime No.218 of 2015 and file a final report, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶18

6.The Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with the above direction.

¶19

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS III)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Sub Inspector of Police
Roshanai Police Station,
Tindivanam – 604 001
Villupuram District
Crime No.218 of 2015.
2.The Public Prosecutor
High Court, Madras.
+1cc to Mr.R.Balakrishnan, Advocate, S.R.No.21656

¶20

Crl.O.P.No.7798 of 2016

¶21

sv(CO) srg(27/04/2016)

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Kulasekaran v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kulasekaran v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Swathy Vs State Rep by

A.Thirumugam Vs the Inspector of Police

K.Thangamani Vs the Superintendent of Police

M.Vijayaraj, Vs The Superintendent of Police

A.Krishnamoorthy Vs the Deputy Superintendent of

P.Easwari Vs the Inspector of Police