Disposed

P.Easwari v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC6 Apr 2016CRL OP/7742/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras, in a Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 CrPC, directed the police to complete the investigation and file a final report in Crime No. 1175 of 2014 within three months from the date of receipt of the order, rejecting the prosecution's request for indefinite delay.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondent police to complete the investigation and file a final report in Crime No. 1175 of 2014 within three months.

P.Easwari Vs the Inspector of Police — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 06.04.2016

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.7742 of 2016

¶6

P.Easwari ... Petitioner

¶7

Vs.

¶8

State rep by The Inspector of Police (Crime) T-4, Maduravoyal Police Station, Chennai. ... Respondent

¶9

Prayer :

¶10

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to direct the respondent police to file a final report in Crime No.1175 of 2014 dated 26.08.2014 within stipulated time period.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Prince Premkumar For Respondents: Mr.C.Emalias

¶12

Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER

¶13

The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking a direction to the respondent police to file a final report in Crime No.1175 of 2014 dated 26.08.2014 within stipulated time period.

¶14

2.Heard the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on either side.

¶15

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner dated 26.08.2014, a case has been registered in Crime No.1175 of 2014 for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 354, 420 I.P.C. r/w 4 of TNPHW Act. However, the respondent has not shown any interest to investigate the matter and lay a final report. Hence, the petitioner has come up with the present petition for the relief as stated above.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

4.Resisting the same, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that investigation is going on and hence, he prays for three months time to complete the investigation and file a final report.

¶18

5.Considering the submissions made on both sides, the respondent is directed to complete the investigation in Crime No. 1175 of 2014 and file a final report, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶19

6.The Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with the above direction.

¶20

-s/d-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Inspector of Police (Crime)
T-4, Maduravoyal Police Station,
Chennai.
2.The Public Prosecutor
High Court, Madras.
Crl.O.P.No.7742 of 2016
aa22/04/2016

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P.Easwari v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Easwari v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Swathy Vs State Rep by

A.Thirumugam Vs the Inspector of Police

K.Thangamani Vs the Superintendent of Police

M.Vijayaraj, Vs The Superintendent of Police

Kulasekaran Vs State Rep by

A.Krishnamoorthy Vs the Deputy Superintendent of