The High Court rejected the petitioner's plea for anticipatory bail in a fraud case involving job racketing, where a prior petition for similar relief had been dismissed.
Criminal Original Petition dismissed; anticipatory bail not granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Crl.O.P.No.5376 of 2016
K.KALYANASUNDARAM,J.
The petitioner, who is arrayed as accused, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under sections 406 and 420 r/w 34 IPC in Crime No.673 of 2010 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.
2.When the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the respondent police has received the complaint against the petitioner for job racketing. He would further add that the petitioner had received a total a sum of Rs.18,00,000/- from eight persons to secure employment in the Government Department. He would further point out that the earlier petition filed by the petitioner seeking anticipatory bail was dismissed on 09.12.2015.
3.Considering the said submission of the learned Government Advocate [Crl. Side], this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail. Hence, the criminal original petition is dismissed.
06.04.2016
cla
2
K.KALYANASUNDARAM,J
cla
Crl.O.P.No.5376 of 2016
Dated: 06.04.2016
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail ought to be granted to the petitioner, who is accused of cheating and job racketing and apprehends arrest.
Whether repeated filings anticipatory bail in the same facts warrant its dismissal.
K. KALYANASUNDARAM, J.
Respondent Police
K. KALYANASUNDARAM, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
