Disposed

R.Ayyappan v. State Rep. by

Madras HC24 Feb 2016CRL OP/4095/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A criminal original petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking direction to register a case regarding fraud in purchase of house plots. The court directed the police to include the petitioner as a witness in an existing investigation with similar charges against the same accused.

What did the court decide?

Police directed to include the petitioner as a witness in the existing Crime No.37/2016 and examine him; petition dismissed otherwise.

R.Ayyappan Vs State Rep. by — Madras HC (2016) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 24.02.2016

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R.MALA

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.4095 of 2016

¶6

R.Ayyappan .. Petitioner

¶7

Vs. State rep. by Inspector of Police Central Crime Branch E.D.F. - I Team – I Vepery, Chennai-7. .. Respondent

¶8

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the respondent to register a case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 04.01.2016.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.J.K.Mony Angelus

¶10

For Respondent :Mr.C.Emalias Addl. Public Prosecutor O R D E R

¶11

The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction to the respondent to register a case pertaining to the petitioner's complaint dated 04.01.2016.

¶12

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has approached Thiru Promoters for purchase of house plots and that the petitioner has paid some amount. Later the petitioner came to know that the property does not belong to Thiru Promoters. Since the proprietor of Thiru Promoters refused to return the money to the petitioner, he lodged the present complaint before the respondent police on 04.01.2016. But the respondent has not shown any interest to enquire the matter and register the case. Hence, the petitioner has come forward with this petition for the above stated relief.

¶13

3.Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that on the basis of the complaint given by one Periyasamy, a case has been registered in Crime No.37 of 2016 for the offences under https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Sections 420, 506(ii) read with 34 I.P.C., against Thiru

¶14

Promoters. The petitioner herein has been cited as a witness. Since the petitioner was examined as the witness in the above said crime number, there is no necessity to register the F.I.R. for each and every separate cognizable offences. Therefore, he prays for dismissal of this petition.

¶15

4.Considering the rival submissions made on both sides, the case has been registered against Thiru Promoters on the basis of the complaint given by one Periyasamy. Furthermore, according to the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, more than 19 complaints were received against Thiru Promoters. Under such circumstances, the respondent police is directed to include the name of the petitioner as the witness in the list of witnesses and examine him.

¶16

5.The Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with the above direction.

¶17

kj Sd/-
Asst.Registrar
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
To
1.The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch,
E.D.F. - I Team – I, Vepery, Chennai-7.
2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Chennai.
+ 1 cc to Mr.J.K.Mony Angelus, Advocate Sr 11504
KR/1/3/16

¶18

Crl.O.P.No.4095 of 2016

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Ayyappan v. State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Ayyappan v. State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Kalarani, W/O.Palani, Vs the Inspector of Police

R.Balamurugan Vs State Rep. by Its

Vinoth Kumar Vs the Commissioner of Police

Arulprakasam Vs The Superintendent of Police

S.Karpagam Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

M.Dakshinamoorthy Vs the Superintendent of Police