Disposed

P.Kalarani, W/O.Palani, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC22 Feb 2016CRL OP/12015/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal original petition under Section 482 CrPC, the wife of a deceased motorcyclist sought transfer of investigation to C.B.C.I.D. alleging the police dropped the case against the deceased based on incorrect findings. The court observed procedural lapses by the Investigating Officer and directed the Deputy Superintendent of Police to reopen the case.

What did the court decide?

Director Deputy Superintendent of Police, Gudiyatham to reopen the case and conduct further investigation and file report.

P.Kalarani, W/O.Palani, Vs the Inspector of Police — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 22.02.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R. MALA

¶5

CRL.O.P.No.12015 of 2014 and

¶6

M.P.No.1 of 2014

¶7

P.Kalarani .. Petitioner/Wife of Deceased
.. Vs ..
1. The Inspector of Police,
Gudiyatham Town Police Station,
Vellore District.
2. Karthik .. Respondents/Complainants

¶8

Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to transfer the investigation in Crime No.989 of 2013 from the first respondent police to C.B.C.I.D., Vellore District, to ensure to get justice and fair investigation.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Subramani
For R-1 : Mr.C.Emalias,
Additional Public Prosecutor

¶10

ORDER

¶11

The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking to transfer the investigation in Crime No.989 of 2013 from the first respondent police to C.B.C.I.D., Vellore District, to ensure to get justice and fair investigation.

¶12

The petitioner is the wife of the deceased Palani, who died in a road accident said to be taken place on 20.12.2013 at night hours by collision of two vehicles viz., Bajaj CT 100 bearing Registration No.TN-23-7412, belonging to one Manikantan and the vehicle viz., motorcycle, belonging to the deceased/Palani, bearing Registration No.TN-23-BQ-9157. In the said accident, the owner-cum-driver of the motorcycle bearing Registration No.TN-23-BQ-9157 has thrown away in front of a four wheeler vehicle, which dashed against the deceased/Palani and he

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

died on the spot itself. On the basis of the complaint given by one Karthick, pillion rider of the two wheeler Bajaj CT 100 bearing Registration No.TN-23-7412, a case in Crime No.989 of 2013 has been registered against the deceased/Palani. The brother of the deceased/Palani has given a complaint to the first respondent police on 21.12.2013 stating that the driver of the two wheeler viz., Bajaj CT 100 bearing Registration No.TN-23-7412 alone is responsible for the accident and the deceased/Palani is not responsible for the accident. The said complaint given by the brother of the deceased/Palani was not considered by the Investigating Officer and the Investigating Officer has closed his investigation stating that the deceased/Palani himself has caused the accident and action also has been dropped. Hence, the petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking to transfer the investigation in Crime No.989 of 2013 from the file of the first respondent police to C.B.C.I.D. Vellore District.

¶15

The first respondent police has filed a detailed status report, wherein, at paragraph No.3, the Investigating Officer has stated that he examined the driver of the two wheeler viz., Bajaj CT 100 bearing Registration No.TN-23-7412 and his pillion rider namely, Karthick and he has also examined one Parameswaran and Paranthaman as L.W.1 and L.W.2 and recorded their statements. But, in his status report, there is no mention about the scene of occurrence, whether it is residential area or commercial area and whether any independent witnesses have been examined. Hence, it is a fit case for setting aside the action drop report and to transfer the investigation to the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Gudiyatham, since the investigation has been done by the first respondent police not in proper direction and without examining the wife of the deceased and other inmates.

¶16

In such circumstances, the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Gudiyatham, is directed to take up the matter and re-open the case and do the further investigation and file his report in accordance with law uninfluenced by the observations made by this Court in this order and also the investigation done by the first respondent police.

¶17

With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/-

Asst.Registrar (CO)

/true copy/

Sub Asst. Registrar

Jrl

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶24

¶25

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Gudiyatham.

¶26

The Inspector of Police, Gudiyatham Town Police Station, Vellore District.

¶27

The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶28

1 cc to Mr.N. Subramani, Advocate, Sr. 11259
CRL.O.P.No.12015 of 2014
SCD (CO)
kk 11/3

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P.Kalarani, W/O.Palani, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Kalarani, W/O.Palani, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs.S.Loshika, W/O.Shanmugavel Vs Mr.K.Sathish Kannanan

G.Purushothaman Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

M. Sathya Narayana, Vs the Commissioner of Police

J.C.Gissaram Vs the Superintendent of Police

S.Babu Vs the Inspector of Police

P.Ramaiah Vs the Commissioner of Police