Petitioner sought registration of a complaint regarding annoying SMS from OLA cabs under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The court held the complaint disclosed no cognizable offence and rejected the prayer for registration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 10.06.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH
CRL.OP.No.11501 of 2016
K.T.Muralidharan ... Petitioner
Vs
The State rep by
The Assistant Commissioner of Police [Cyber Crime Cell]
CCB, Commissioner Office Campus, Vepery, Chennai-7. ... Respondent
Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent to register the pending complaint dated 12.04.2016.
For Petitioner : Mr.E.Sivanandan
For Respondent : Mr.C.Emalias, APP O R D E R
This petition has been filed to register the petitioner's complaint dated 12.04.2016.
Recording the submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this petition is closed.
Sd/-
Asst.Registrar (CS VI )
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
gya
To
1.The Assistant Commissioner of Police,
[Cyber Crime Cell],
CCB, Commissioner Office Campus,
Vepery, Chennai-7.
2.The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
1 cc to M/s.E. Sivanandan, Advocate, Sr. 31219
CRL.OP.No.11501 of 2016
MP (CO)
kk 23/6
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should direct the Respondent to register a complaint regarding unwanted SMS from OLA cabs under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.T. Muralidharan
The State rep by The Assistant Commissioner of Police [Cyber Crime Cell]
P.N. Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
