Dismissed

B.Ganesh Kumar v. the Superintendent of Police

Madras HC7 Jun 2016CRL OP/10173/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a Criminal Original Petition seeking directions to register a complaint. The Court found the facts involved a private civil money dispute and prohibited in the absence of a public offence, denying the request for registration and closing the petition.

What did the court decide?

The petition to direct registration of the complaint was closed; the petitioner was given liberty to exercise remedies known to law.

B.Ganesh Kumar Vs the Superintendent of Police — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED:07.06.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH

¶5

CRL.OP.No.10173 of 2016

¶6

B.Ganesh Kumar ...Petitioner
Vs.
1.State rep by
The Superintendent of Police,
O/o.The Superintendent of Police,
Tirupur.
2.The Inspector of Police,
District Crime Branch, Tirupur.
3.The Inspector of Police,
Alangiyam Police Station,
Alangiyam, Dharapuram Taluk. ...Respondents

¶7

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents to register the petitioner's complaint dated 09.03.2016.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Ponraj

¶9

For Respondents : Mr.C.Emalias,

¶10

Addl.Public Prosecutor

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

This petition has been filed to direct the respondents to register the petitioner's complaint dated 09.03.2016.

¶13

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents and perused the materials placed on record.

¶14

On reading of the complaint dated 09.03.2016, it is seen that the petitioner has lent around Rs.2crores to the opposite party by bank transfer and that for the amount borrowed, the opposite party has issued promissory notes and cheques. The dispute is civil in nature.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

In a case of this nature, no positive direction can be issued as prayed for by the petitioner and this petition is closed, with liberty to the petitioner to workout his remedies in the manner known to law.

¶17

With the above direction, this petition is closed.

¶18

gya

¶19

Sd/Assistant Registra

¶20

//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Superintendent of Police,
O/o.The Superintendent of Police,
Tirupur.
2.The Inspector of Police,
District Crime Branch, Tirupur.
3.The Inspector of Police,
Alangiyam Police Station,
Alangiyam, Dharapuram Taluk.
4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
+ 1 cc to Mr.N.Ponraj, Advocate Sr 30997

¶21

CRL.OP.No.10173 of 2016

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

B.Ganesh Kumar v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B.Ganesh Kumar v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Palaniammal Vs the State of Tamilnadu through

M.Ganesan Vs the Superintendent of Police

Akilesh Kumar Jiswal Vs the Commissioner of Police

Ravishankar Vs the Inspector of Police

Godgil Vs the Inspector of Police

Mr.Suresh @ Marisamy Vs M/S.Jyothik Engi. Enterprises