Allowed

Murugan v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC18 Oct 2016CRL MP(MD)/7677/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court allowed a petition for suspension of sentence. The court suspended the life imprisonment term imposed on the second appellant pending his criminal appeal and directed him to be enlarged on bail under specific conditions, citing similar orders passed for co-accused earlier.

What did the court decide?

Substantive sentence of imprisonment suspended; petitioner enlarged on bail subject to bond with sureties and monthly reporting.

Murugan Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Tuesday, the Eighteenth day of October Two Thousand Sixteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Honble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU and The Honble Mr.Justice M.V.MURALIDARAN

¶5

CRL MP(MD) No.7677 of 2016 IN CRL A(MD) No.311 of 2016

¶6

MURUGAN ... PETITIONER/APPELLANT

¶7

STATE REP.BY

¶8

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KALLIDAIKURICHI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. CR.NO.375/2013 ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶9

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to Suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner by the Learned IV - Additional Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli and passed in S.C.No.185 of 2015 dated 29.1.2016 and enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the Criminal Appeal.

¶10

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S C.CHRISTOPHER, Advocate for the petitioner and of Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶11

(Order of the Court was made by S.NAGAMUTHU, J )

¶12

The petitioner/appellant is the 2^nd accused in S.C.No.185 of 2015 on the file of learned IV Additional Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli. He has been convicted for the offence under Section 302 r/w 109 IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default, to undergo six months rigorous imprisonment. Challenging the said conviction and sentence imposed, the petitioner has come up with this appeal. Pending appeal, he seeks suspension of the substantive sentence of imprisonment imposed on him.

¶13

We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent and we have https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ also perused the records carefully.

¶14

It is brought to our notice that earlier, this Court, by order dated 16.09.2016, suspended the sentence on the third accused as per order in Crl.M.P.No.6178/2016 in Crl.A.No.274/2016. This Court also suspended the sentence imposed on the first accused as per the order dated 05.10.2016 in Crl.M.P.No.5321/2016 in Crl.A.No.236/2016. The petitioner also stands in the same footing. Therefore, we are inclined to suspend the sentence of imprisonment alone imposed on the petitioner pending appeal.

¶15

Accordingly, this petition is allowed and the substantive sentence of imprisonment imposed on the petitioner alone is suspended and the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail, on the following conditions:

¶16

The petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/(Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ambasamudram, Tirunelveli District and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the committal Court at 10.30 a.m., on the first working day of every English Calender Month, until further orders.

¶17

sd/-

¶18

18/10/2016 / TRUE COPY /

¶19

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶20

¶21

TO 1 THE IV ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, TIRUNELVELI

¶22

2 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE AMBASAMUDRAM, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT

¶23

3 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT

¶24

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KALLIDAIKURICHI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

¶25

5 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶26

+1. C.C. to M/S C.CHRISTOPHER Advocate SR.No.61208

¶27

GJM/SKS.RR.SAR-III-20.10.16-2P-7C

¶28

ORDER

¶29

¶30

CRL MP(MD) No.7677 of 2016 IN

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ CRL A(MD) No.311 of 2016 Date :18/10/2016

Murugan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Murugan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

E. Rajendran Vs the Deputy Superintendent of

Kannan @ Ramanathan Vs the Inspector of Police

Logendran Vs the Inspector of Police

K.Manivel Vs the Inspector of Police

Mayandi Vs the Inspector of Police

P. Ganesan Vs the Inspector of Police