Petitioners in a criminal case sought relaxation from a daily appearance order. The Court modified the condition for complying petitioners to report as required but dismissed the petition regarding petitioners who failed to comply.
Condition modified to report as required for 1, 2, and 5 to 23; petition dismissed against 3, 4, A.4, and A.5.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Third day of August Two Thousand Sixteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI
CRL MP(MD) No.6353 of 2016 IN CRL OP(MD) No.9694 of 2016
1 S. SATHISH
Vs
STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THERIRUVELI POLICE STATION,
MUDUKULATHUR TALUK,RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT,
CR NO. 38 OF 2016. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed by this Honourable Court that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent No.2 police station, daily at 5.00 P.M until further orders in Crl.O.P.(MD). No.9654 of 2016 dated 23.6.2016 in Cr. No.38 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police.
Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the
petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S T.LAJAPATHI ROY, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.K.ANBARASAN Government Advocate(Crl.Side) on behalf of the Respondents the court made the following order:-
Heard both sides.
2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that the petitioners 3 and 4/A.4 and A.5 have not complied with the condition after 21.07.2016 and the other petitioners are complying with the condition regularly.
3.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the condition imposed already on the petitioners 1, 2 and 5 to 23 is modified to the effect that the petitioners 1, 2 and 5 to 23 are directed to report before the respondent Police as and when required for interrogation.
4.Considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side), this petition is dismissed as against the petitioners 3 and 4/A.4 and A.5.
sd/-
03/08/2016
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
ORDER IN
CRL MP(MD) No.6353 of 2016 IN
CRL OP(MD) No.9694 of 2016 Date :03/08/2016
AA/NGM-MP/SAR-I/05.08.2016/2p-6c
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an existing condition of daily appearance for petitioners should be relaxed to reporting 'as and when required'?
S. SATHISH and others
STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
V.M.VELUMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
