Dismissed

Ilaiya Raja v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC3 Aug 2016CRL MP(MD)/5980/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order dismisses petitions seeking relaxation of conditions imposed on anticipatory bail granted to two accused charged under the IPC. The court found the reason for relaxation, i.e., being sole breadwinners, unacceptable despite compliance with existing terms.

What did the court decide?

Petitions seeking relaxation of conditions imposed on anticipatory bail were dismissed; petitioners must continue complying with existing terms.

Ilaiya Raja Vs the Inspector of Police — Cheating and Forgery | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Third day of August Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT

¶2

The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI

¶3

CRL MP(MD) Nos.5980 and 5981 of 2016 IN CRL OP(MD) Nos.9782 and 9783 of 2016

¶4

ILAIYA RAJA ... PETITIONER/PETITIONER/ ACCUSED No.4 IN CRL MP(MD)No.5980/2016 IN CRL OP(MD)No.9782/2016 MUNIYASAMY ... PETITIONER/PETITIONER/ ACCUSED No.3 IN CRL MP(MD)No.5981/2016 IN CRL OP(MD)No.9783/2016 Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, THOOTHUKUDI, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT, CR NO. 38/2016. ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT IN BOTH THE PETITIONS

¶5

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed on the Petitioner in Crl.O.P.(MD)NO. 9782 of 2016 dated 21.06.2016 .

¶6

Prayer in CRL MP(MD). 5981/ 2016 :

¶7

To relax the condition imposed on the Petitioner in Crl. O. P. (MD) NO. 9783 of 2016 dated 21.06.2016.

¶8

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S S.P.PRABAKARAN, Advocate for the petitioner in CRL MP(MD) No.5980/2016 in CRL OP(MD)No.9782/2016 and M/S.MUNIYASAMY, Advocate for the petitioner in CRL MP(MD)No.5981/2016 in CRL OP(MD) No.9783/2016 and of Mr.K.ANBARASAN, Government Advocate (Crl.side) on behalf of the Respondent in both the petitions the court made the following order:-

¶9

These petitions have been filed praying to relax the condition imposed on the petitioners in Crl.O.P(MD)Nos.9782 and 9783 of 2016, dated 21.06.2016, by this Court.

¶10

2.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioners have been charged for the offences under Sections 419, 465, 468, 471, 420 and 120(B) IPC in Crime No.38 of 2016 on the file

¶11

of the respondent police and they moved petitions for anticipatory bail before this Court in Crl.O.P(MD)Nos.9782 and 9783 of 2016 and this Court vide order dated 21.06.2016 granted anticipatory bail to them with certain conditions and the petitioner in Crl.O.P(MD) No.9782 of 2016 has been directed to appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. until further orders and the petitioner in Crl.O.P(MD)No.9783 of 2016 has been directed to appear before the respondent police every Sunday at 10.00 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners are complying with the condition from 03.07.2016. The petitioners are the only bread winners of their families and therefore prays for relaxation of the said conditions.

¶12

3.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submitted that the petitioners are complying with the condition from 03.07.2016.

¶13

4.This Court after considering the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioners granted anticipatory bail to them vide order dated 21.06.2016 with the specific condition as stated above. The reason given by the petitioners is not acceptable and therefore this Court is not inclined to relax the conditions imposed on the petitioners and accordingly these petitions are dismissed.

sd/-

03/08/2016

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶18

¶19

THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKUDI.

¶20

THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKUDI.

¶21

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, THOOTHUKUDI, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT,

¶22

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶23

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶24

+1. C.C. to M/S S.P.PRABAKARAN Advocate SR.No. 41582

¶25

ORDER IN

¶26

CRL MP(MD) Nos.5980 & 5981/2016 IN

¶27

CRL OP(MD) Nos.9782 & 9783/2016 Date :03/08/2016

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ SMN

¶29

TE/NGM-MP/SAR-III : 05/08/2016 : 2P/6C

Ilaiya Raja v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ilaiya Raja v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anthony Vincent Vs the Inspector of Police

Sathiya Moorthy Vs the Inspector of Police

Chembatai @ Muthu Pandi Vs the Inspector of Police

S. Rajendran Nath @ Rajendran Vs the Inspector of Police

Aalappan, Vs the Inspector of Police

S. Sathish Vs the Inspector of Police