Partly allowed

Anandh @ Anandhan v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Madras HC27 Jul 2016CRL MP(MD)/6021/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a petition to relax the reporting condition imposed in a connected bail order. The court heard arguments where the Government Advocate submitted the petitioner was complying. The court modified the condition to weekly reporting on Mondays at 10:00 AM.

What did the court decide?

The condition imposed in the connected order is modified to require the petitioner to report once a week on Mondays at 10:00 AM.

Anandh @ Anandhan Vs the Sub Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Wednesday, the Twenty Seventh day of July Two Thousand Sixteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL MP(MD) No.6021 of 2016 IN CRL OP(MD) No.10171 of 2016

¶5

ANANDH @ ANANDHAN ... PETITIONER/PETITIONER

¶6

¶7

THE STATE REP.BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE MATHGUPATTI POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. (CRIME NO. 135 OF 2016) ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶8

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed in Crl.O.P.(MD)No. 10171 of 2016 dated 24.06.2016

¶9

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S M.RAMU, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.K.ANBARASAN Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶10

Heard both sides.

¶11

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the petitioner is complying with the condition regularly.

¶12

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the condition already imposed on the petitioner is modified to the effect that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police once in a week I.e., on every Monday at 10.00 a.m., until further orders.

¶13

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Madurai - 625 023.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

AM TO

¶16

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAGANGAI.

¶17

2 -DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAGANGAI.

¶18

3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MATHGUPATTI POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

¶19

4 THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, THIRUKOSTIYUR POLICE STATION, THIRUKOSTIYUR, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

¶20

5 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

¶21

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.

¶22

+1. C.C. to M/S M.RAMU Advocate SR.No.39784

¶23

GJM/GSV/PM/SAR-I-29.7.16-2P-7C

¶24

ORDER IN

¶25

CRL MP(MD) No.6021 of 2016

¶26

¶27

CRL OP(MD) No.10171 of 2016

¶28

Date :27/07/2016

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Anandh @ Anandhan v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anandh @ Anandhan v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Natesan Vs the State Rep.by

Rev.Fr.Devadoss Vs the Inspector of Police

Arumugam Vs the Inspector of Police

Abbas @ Abbas Mydeen Vs the Inspector of Police

Balu Vs the Inspector of Police

N.Masilamani Vs the Inspector of Police