The court disposed of the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition as unnecessary, noting that the sentenced was already suspended and a bond would be executed, thus exempting the petitioner from surrender.
The petition was closed as unnecessary; no travelling necessitated for surrender.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Twenty First day of June Two Thousand Sixteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Dr.Justice P.DEVADASS
CRL MP(MD) No.4925 of 2016 IN
CRL RC(MD) No.415 of 2016
LOGA SRIDHARA PANDIAN ... PETITIONER/APPELLANT/SOLE ACCUSED
Vs
CHANDRA ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to exempt the petitioner from surrendering before the trial court in Judgment in Crl.A.No. 10 of 2014 on the file of Learned Additional District and Session Judge No. V, Madurai in confirming the case in S.T.C. No. 864 of 2008 on the file of Learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur
Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S R.MARIAPPAN, Advocate for the petitioner and while admitting the Criminal Revision Petition the court made the following order:-
Since sentence have been suspended and bond will be executed this petition is closed as unnecessary.
sd/-
21/06/2016
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
CRL MP(MD) No.4925 of 2016 IN
CRL RC(MD) No.415 of 2016
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Date :21/06/2016 AA/NGM-MP/SAR-III/22.06.2016/1p-6c
LOGA SRIDHARA PANDIAN
CHANDRA
P.DEVADASS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
