N. Sivaramakrishnan v. S. Manimaran
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court granted revision bail to the petitioner in a cheque bouncing case under Section 138 NI Act, suspended the prison sentence, imposed surety conditions, and stayed the operation of the compensation payment order pending disposal of the main criminal revision.
What did the court decide?
Revision bail granted; sentence suspended; stay on compensation order; deposit of Rs.50,000; bond conditions imposed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Twenty First day of June Two Thousand Sixteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Dr.Justice P.DEVADASS
CRL MP(MD) No.3890 of 2016 IN CRL RC(MD) No.288 of 2016
N. SIVARAMAKRISHNAN
... PETITIONER/PETITIONER/ APPELLANT/ACCUSED
S. MANIMARAN ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT/COMPLAINANT
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail by suspending the sentence imposed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dindigul in C.A.No. 30 of 2013 confirming the judgment passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Palani dated 01.02.2016 pending disposal of the main Crl.R.C.
Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S S.RAMASAMY, Advocate for the petitioner and the court made the following order:-
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to revision bail and suspension of sentence given prima facie case and arguable points.
Whether the order directing payment of compensation under Section 357(3) Cr.P.C should be stayed pending main revision.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
N. SIVARAMAKRISHNAN
- respondent
S. MANIMARAN
Coram
P.DEVADASS
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court