Partly allowed

N.Jegatheesan v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC20 Apr 2016CRL MP(MD)/3165/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court granted an extension of time to the petitioner to execute sureties before the Judicial Magistrate. The extension was due to the petitioner's inability to appear on time because he sustained hip injuries from falling in the bathroom, supported by a medical certificate.

What did the court decide?

Time granted to the petitioner to execute sureties before the court concerned up to 26.04.2016.

N.Jegatheesan Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Twentieth day of April Two Thousand Sixteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.CHOCKALINGAM

¶6

CRL MP(MD) No.3165 of 2016 and CRL OP(MD)No.4038 of 2016

¶7

N.JEGATHEESAN

¶8

..PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.3

¶9

Vs.

¶10

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AUSTINPATTI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.76/2016)

¶11

..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶12

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to grant extension of time for a further period of one month for the appearance of the petitioner before the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned as per the order passed in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.4038/2016 order dated 23.3.2016.

¶13

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.BABU RAJENDRAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.C.MAYIL VAHANA RAJENDRAN, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶14

This application is filed to grant extension of time for the appearance of the petitioner before the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned, as per the order passed by this court in Crl.O.P(MD)No.4038 of 2016, dated 23.03.2016.

¶15

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail by this court on 23.03.2016 with a condition to appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the order and that the order copy was made ready and delivered to the petitioner on 28.03.2016 and hence, the petitioner ought to have appeared before the learned Judicial Magistrate on or before 11.04.2016. In the above circumstances, the petitioner fell down in the bath room and sustained injuries on his hip on 04.04.2016 and the doctor advised him to take bed rest for a month and hence, the petitioner was not able to appear before the Magistrate concerned. The learned counsel has also https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ produced a doctor certificate for the injuries sustained by the

¶16

¶17

petitioner.

¶18

3.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) has not

¶19

disputed the said fact.

¶20

4.Keeping in view of the above facts, this court is inclined to

¶21

grant time to the petitioner upto 26.04.2016 to execute the sureties before the court concerned. The other conditions shall stand unaltered.

¶22

/ TRUE COPY /

¶23

¶24

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUMANGALAM, MADURAI DISTRICT.

¶25

2 -do-thro' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,MADURAI.

¶26

3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.

¶27

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AUSTINPATTI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

¶28

+1 CC to Mr.BABU RAJENDRAN, Advocate, SR No.21847

¶29

CRL MP(MD) No.3165 of 2016 and CRL OP(MD)No.4038 of 2016

¶30

¶31

SH/SKS-RR/AR-I:25.04.2016:2P/6C

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

N.Jegatheesan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N.Jegatheesan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sivagurunathan Vs the Inspector of Police

V. Savarimuthu Vs the Inspector of Police

Santhanam Vs the Inspector of Police

Babu @ Poweersingam Vs the Inspector of Police

Pandeeswaran Vs the Inspector of Police

Andiyappan @ Rajasekar Vs the Sub Inspector of Police