Partly allowed

Sivagurunathan v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC18 Apr 2016CRL MP(MD)/3176/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought to modify bail conditions from Crl.O.P.(MD) No.3826 of 2016. Court allowed modification, directing petitioner to appear before the concerned Court every Monday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders, noting regular compliance.

What did the court decide?

Condition imposed on petitioner modified to require appearance before the concerned Court every Monday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

Sivagurunathan Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Monday, the Eighteenth day of April Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.CHOCKALINGAM

¶5

CRL MP(MD) No.3176 of 2016 IN CRL OP(MD)NO.3826 OF 2016

¶6

SIVAGURUNATHAN ... PETITIONER/PETITIONER

¶7

¶8

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PERUMALPURAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

¶9

(CR. NO.120/2016) ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶10

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.3826 of 2016 dated 03.03.2016.

¶11

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.A.ANANDAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.KANNITHEVAN, Govt.Advocate(Crl.Side) on behalf of the Respondents the court made the following order:-

¶12

The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner is complying with the condition regularly without fail.

¶13

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the condition already imposed on the petitioner is modified to the effect that the petitioner is directed to appear before the concerned Court every Monday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

sd/-

18/04/2016

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

¶18

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶19

Madurai - 625 023.

¶20

¶21

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I,TIRUNELVELI.

¶22

2 DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

¶23

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

¶24

PERUMALPURAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

¶25

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.

¶26

+1. C.C. to M/S A.ANANDAN Advocate SR.No.21618

¶27

ORDER

¶28

¶29

CRL MP(MD) No.3176 of 2016

¶30

IN CRL OP(MD)NO.3826 OF 2016

¶31

Date :18/04/2016

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶33

PA/JGB-DP/SARI/22.04.2016/1P/6C

Sivagurunathan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sivagurunathan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S. Balaguru Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Abirami @ Priya Vs Ganeshkumar

P. Ajith Kumar Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

V. Savarimuthu Vs the Inspector of Police

Santhanam Vs the Inspector of Police

Arjunan Vs the Inspector of Police