Allowed

Babu @ Suburam v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC13 Apr 2016CRL MP(MD)/3016/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought a 15-day extension to furnish sureties as per a prior court order. The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court allowed the petition on the condition that petitioners pay Rs.500 to the Legal Services Committee and surrender before the Trial Court by April 18, 2016.

What did the court decide?

Extension of 15 days for furnishing sureties granted conditionally upon paying Rs.500 and surrendering by 18.04.2016.

Babu @ Suburam Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Thirteenth day of April Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT

¶3

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.CHOCKALINGAM

¶4

CRL MP(MD) No.3016 of 2016 IN CRL OP(MD) No.1377 of 2016

¶5

1 BABU @ SUBURAM

¶6

2 KAMU @ KAMARAJ

¶7

5 NADUPANDI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 5

¶8

Vs STATE REP.BY

¶9

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VILAMPATTI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT,

¶10

CR NO. 11/2016. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶11

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to extend 15 days time for furnishing the sureties before the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai as per order of this Honourable Court made in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1377/2016 dated 02/02/2016 in connection with the Crime No.11/2016 on the file of the Inspector of Police,Vilampatti Police Station, Dindigul District.

¶12

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S K.MANIKANDAN, Advocate for the petitioners and of MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶13

This petition is filed to extend 15 days time for furnishing sureties before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakkottai as per the direction of this Court in Crl.O.P.

¶14

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Government Advocate (Crl.side).

¶15

¶16

3.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this petition is allowed on condition that the petitioners shall pay a sum of Rs.500/(rupees five hundred only) to the Tamil Nadu Legal Services Committee, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai by today and the petitioners are directed to surrender before the Trial Court on or before 18.04.2016, failing which, this petition stands dismissed automatically without further reference to this Court.

¶17

sd/-

¶18

13/04/2016

¶19

/ TRUE COPY /

¶20

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

¶21

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶22

Madurai - 625 023.

¶23

¶24

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NILAKKOTTAI.

¶25

2 DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

¶26

3 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, THALLAKULAM POLICE STATION,MADURAI.

¶27

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VILAMPATTI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

¶28

5 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.

¶29

6 THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, TAMIL NADU LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶30

+1. C.C. to M/S K.MANIKANDAN Advocate SR.No.20637

¶31

ORDER

¶32

¶33

CRL MP(MD) No.3016 of 2016 IN

¶34

CRL OP(MD) No.1377 of 2016

¶35

Date :13/04/2016

¶36

PA/SK-SKN/SAR I/13.04.2016/2P/8C(IT)

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Babu @ Suburam v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Babu @ Suburam v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kannan Vs the Inspector of Police

Rajasekaran Vs the Inspector of Police

Senthilraja Vs the Inspector of Police

I.Mohamed Ghouse Vs the Inspector of Police

M. Ayisha Benasir Vs Mr. Thajudeen Oli Sikkandar

Kathavetti Vs the Inspector of Police