C. Nagarajan v. R.Rangarajan
Case brief
What is this about?
The court treated the matter procedurally under a contempt petition, closing it by exercising previously granted liberty for the petitioner to claim wage difference in a separate application.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATE: 09.02.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
Cont.P.No.874 of 2015
C.Nagarajan ... Petitioner
Vs.
Mr.R.Rangarajan, Managing Director, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd.,
Rep. by its Managing Director Mr.R.Rangarajan, Kumbakonam Division 1, Kumbakonam. ... Respondent
Prayer: This Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 70/71 to punish the respondent for having committed contempt of Court for disobeying the common order dated 08.04.2014 and made in W.P.No.42519 of 2006
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Venkatesalu
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C.Nagarajan
- respondent
Mr.R.Rangarajan
Coram
T.S.Sivagnanam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court