R.Murugan v. G.Paulraj
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner sought punishment for contempt under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for disobeying a court order of 31.10.2014. Upon hearing, counsel for both parties submitted that the order had been complied with, leading the court to close the petition.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition is closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.01.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH
CONTEMPT PETITION No. 575 of 2015
R. Murugan ..Petitioner
Vs.
1. G. Paulraj,
Managing Director,
The Tamil Nadu State
TRAnsport Corporation
(Tirunelveli) Ltd.,
No.19, Trivandrum Road,
Vannarpettai Post,
Tirunelveli – 627 003.
2. K. Murugan,
General Manager,
The Tamil Nadu State Transport
Corporation (Tirunelveli) Ltd.,
Nagercoil Region,
Ranithottam, Nesamani Nager,
Nagercoil – 629 001. ..Respondents
Prayer: Petition under Sections 11 & 12 of the Contempt of
Courts Act, 70/71 to punish the respondents for having
committed contempt of Court by disobeying the order dated
31.10.2014 made in W.P. No. 16109 of 2014.
For Petitioner :: Mr.N. Rajan
For Respondents :: Mr.V. Subbiah,
Special Govt. Pleader
O R D E R
When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is submitted by the learned counsel on either side that the order of this Court has been complied with.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be closed after the order of the Court was complied with.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R. Murugan
- respondent
G. Paulraj
- respondent
K. Murugan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court