K.Chitra v. Vibu Nair IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
This is an order disposing of a contempt petition filed under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against official respondents. The petitioner submitted that the prior court order had been complied with, and the Government Advocate produced evidence of compliance. Consequently, the court closed the petition and connected sub-applications.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition and connected sub-applications are closed as the court order has been complied with.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.01.2016
CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH CONTEMPT PETITION No. 481 of 2015
&
Sub-Application No. 929 of 2015
K. Chitra ..Petitioner
Vs.
1. Vibu Nair I.A.S.,
The Chairman/ Member Secretary
Teachers Recruitment Board,
EVK Sampath Maaligai,
DPI Compound,
College Road,
Chennai – 600 006.
- Dr. S.Kannappan
The Director of School Education,
DPI Compound, College Road,
Nungambakkam,
Chennai – 600 006. ..Respondents
Prayer: Petition under Sections 11 & 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 70/71 to punish the respondents for having committed contempt of Court by disobeying the order dated 01.12.2014 made in W.P. No. 25368 of 2014.
For Petitioner :: Mr.C. Senapathi For Respondents :: Mrs.P. Rajalakshmi, Govt. Advocate
O R D E R
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order of this
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners should be punished for contempt of court regarding non-compliance of the order dated 01.12.2014.
Whether the contempt petition and connected sub-applications should be closed given the submission of compliance.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K. Chitra
- respondent
Vibu Nair I.A.S.
- respondent
Dr. S.Kannappan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court