“4.In terms of the above order, the Corporation took a clear stand that as per the inspection, dated 02.11.2015, the building has already been demolished, therefore, nothing requires to be done by the Corporation, as the demolition work has already been carried out. At that juncture, the writ petitioners, represented by the then counsel, Mr.J.Arockia Selvaraj, submitted that there is temporary structure in the corner of the building in question, which is yet to be removed. Taking note of the submission and recording the same in para No.4 of the order, this Court issue direction to the respondents 1 and 2, stating that, if there is any unauthorised construction, the same has to be be removed. Thus, no positive direction was given to the Corporation of Chennai to demolish any portion of the property and as on date of disposal of the writ petition, the superstructure, which had to be demolished, as per the demolition plan, dated 24.08.2009, was already removed. The petitioner would state that the respondents 1 and 2 herein, viz, the writ petitioners, taking advantage of the order, demolished the flat, in which, the petitioner is residing with her family, including her unmarried daughter, and now, they have been https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ pushed to the street. In this regard, several documents are placed to show that the petitioner is in possession of the
