C.Suseela, v. Thiru.R.Venkatesan, Ias.
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, was disposed of on the submission that the respondent had complied with the impugned order by producing a letter dated 10.11.2016.
What did the court decide?
None; the contempt petition is closed due to compliance.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.11.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
Cont.P.No.1845/2016 in WP.No.31565/2014
C.Suseela ..Petitioner
Versus Thiru R.Venkatesan, IAS Secretary to Government Revenue Department Now, Secretary to Government Tamil Development & Information Department, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009. ..Respondent Prayer:Contempt petition filed under section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for wilful disobeyal of the court order in WP.No.31565/2014 dated 27.11.2015. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Ranganathan For Respondent : Mr.S.Babu, GA ORDER
Prayer:Contempt petition filed under section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for wilful disobeyal of the court order in WP.No.31565/2014 dated 27.11.2015.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Babu, learned Government Advocate appearing for the
respondent/contemnor.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent had wilfully disobeyed the court order in WP.No.31565/2014.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C.Suseela
- respondent
Thiru R.Venkatesan
Coram
T.S.Sivagnanam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court