R.Arun v. Moni
Case brief
What is this about?
The court closed a contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act against two respondents for alleged non-compliance of an interim status quo order. The court found that the interim order had been complied with, rendering the petition superfluous. The connected sub-application was also closed.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition and connected sub-application were closed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08.01.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN
Cont.P.No.2726 of 2015
and Sub Appln. No.902 of 2015
R.Arun ... petitioner
Versus
1.Thiru Moni
General Manager,
(Operations)
State Express Transport
Corporation Limited,
Pallavan Salai,
Chennai – 600 002.
2.Thiru Singaravelan
Branch Manager,
Thirunelveli Vannarapettai Depot,
State Express Transport Corporation Ltd.,
Thirunelveli-3. ... Respondents
Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the
Contempt of Court act to punish the respondents for
disobedience of the interim order of status quo granted by
this Court in M.P.No.2 of 2015 in W.P.No.30479 of 2015
dated 28.09.2015.
For petitioner : Mr.R.Krishnaswamy
For Respondents : Mr.P.Pramasivadoss
O R D E R
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents have complied with the interim status quo order passed in W.P.No. 230479 of 2015.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R. Arun
- respondent
Thiru Moni
- respondent
Thiru Singaravelan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court