Mrs.B.Maryselvam v. Dr.N.Subbaiyan, Ias.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience of a court order. The petitioner's counsel submitted that an interim stay was granted on the order in the underlying writ appeal, meaning the original order no longer survives for consideration. Consequently, the contingent petition was closed.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition is closed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.12.2016
Coram:
The Honourable Mr. Justice M.M.SUNDRESH
Contempt Petition No.2053 of 2016
B.Maryselvam ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.Dr.N.Subbaiyan, I.A.S.,
The District Collector,
Thanjavur District,
Thanjavur – 613 001.
2.T.Murugesan,
The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Thanjavur – 613 001. ... Respondents
Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents
herein for wilfully disobeying the directions of this Court
dated 11.12.2015 in W.P.No.5543 of 2014 under the
provisions of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sivavarthanan For Respondents: Mr.Akil Akbar Ali, Govt. Advocate
ORDER
Alleging wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court dated 11.12.2015 in W.P.No.5543 of 2014, the
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ present contempt petition has been filed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
B.Maryselvam
- respondent
Dr.N.Subbaiyan
- respondent
T.Murugesan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court