Mala v. Tamilarasi
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed a miscellaneous petition for interim injunction regarding joint possession because the petitioner did not claim exclusive possession, but directed the registry to post the main appeal for final disposal on a specific date.
What did the court decide?
Petition for interim injunction dismissed; appeal directed to be posted for final disposal on 20.10.2016.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Twentieth day of September Two Thousand Sixteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.S.SUNDAR
CMP(MD) No.3156 of 2016 IN AS(MD) No.45 of 2016
MALA ... PETITIONER/APPELLANT.
Vs
1 TAMILARASI 2 KAVITHA 3 DEVI,
4 USHA,
5 KARTHICK, 6 S.RATHINAVEL 7 V.CHANDRASEKARAN, ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS.
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to pass an order for interim injunction restraining the respondents from interfering the petitioners joint possession and enjoyment of the suit properties in O.S.No.3 of 2011 on the file of II Addl.District Court, Trichirappalli till the disposal of the AS(MD) No.45 of 2016 by this Honourable Court and thus render justice.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an interim injunction can be granted when the petitioner is only in joint possession of the suit properties.
Whether the appeal should be disposed of upon the petition for interim injunction.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mala
- respondent
Tamilaras
- respondent
Kavitha Devi
- respondent
Usha
- respondent
Karthick
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court