Narasimman v. Raman
Case brief
What is this about?
in in C.R.P.(NPD)(SR).No.59775 of 2016…
What did the court decide?
Delay in filing papers (162 days) condensed; petition ordered; registry directed to print name of counsel for respondents at listing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.13538 of 2016 in in C.R.P.(NPD)(SR).No.59775 of 2016 M.DURAISWAMY,J.
There is a delay of 162 days in filing the papers.
2.The learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the respondents have no objection for condoning the delay.
3.Further, being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay is condoned.
4.The petition is ordered.
5.Registry is directed to print the name of Mr.P.Mani, learned counsel for R1 & R2 at the time of listing the matter for admission.
va
01.12.2016
Coram
M.Duraismwamy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court