Shri S.Ponsekar v. the Special Director
Case brief
What is this about?
in Civil Miscellaneous Appeal SR.No.5224 of…
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
C.M.P.No.12314 of 2016
in
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal SR.No.5224 of 2015 S.Manikumar, J a n d D.Krishnakumar, J
Heard Mr.B.Satish Sundar, learned counsel for the petitioner.
- Though the reasons assigned in the supporting affidavit are
not satisfactory, considering the issues raised in the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, we are inclined to condone the delay of 471 days in representing Civil Miscellaneous Appeal SR.No.5224 of 2015, subject to the condition the petitioner pays Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred only) to the Tamil Nadu Advocate Clerks' Association, within a period of one week from today. It is made clear that if cost is not paid, within the above said period, M.P.No.12314 of 2016 would stand dismissed, without any further reference to this Court. On payment
of costs and filing of memo thereof, Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order.
(S.M.K.,J) (D.K.K.,J) 4th August, 2016.
mvs.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether condonation of delay of 471 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal SR.No.5224 of 2015 should be granted on the satisfaction of the assigned reasons.
Coram
S.Manikumar
D.Krishnakumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court