Disposed
M/S Cognizant Technology v. the Incometax Officer(Tds) /
Madras HCCMP/12389/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
in Tax Case Appeal SR.No.88958 of 2014…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
C.M.P.No.12389 of 2016
in Tax Case Appeal SR.No.88958 of 2014
S.Manikumar, J a n d D.Krishnakumar, J
Heard Mr.Venkatanarayanan, learned counsel for the petitioner.
not satisfactory, considering the issues raised in the Tax Appeal, we are inclined to condone the delay of 628 days in representing Tax Case Appeal SR.No.88958 of 2014, subject to the condition the petitioner pays Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred only) to the Tamil Nadu Advocate Clerks' Association, within a period of one week from today. It is made clear that if cost is not paid, within the above said period, M.P.No.12389 of 2016 would stand dismissed, without any further reference to this Court. On payment of costs and filing of memo thereof, Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order.
(S.M.K.,J) (D.K.K.,J) 3rd August 2016
mvs.
2
S.MANIKUMAR,J
A N D D.KRISHNAKUMAR,J
mvs.
Civil Miscellaneous Petition No.12389 of 2016 in Tax Case (Appeal) SR. No.88958 of 2014
3/8/2016
S.Manikumar
D.Krishnakumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court