Allowed

Yesubakthan v. Jaila Rani

Madras HC4 Apr 2016CMA(MD)/579/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court disposed of a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed against an order dismissing a petition for dissolution of marriage. The Court accepted the parties' joint compromise memo filed during the hearing and granted a decree of divorce. No costs were awarded.

What did the court decide?

A decree of divorce dissolving the marriage granted in terms of the Joint Memo of Compromise dated 22.03.2016.

Yesubakthan Vs Jaila Rani — Matrimonial and Divorce | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 04.04.2016

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI

¶6

C.M.A.(MD)No.579 of 2014

Yesubakthan

.. Appellant

Ujaila Rani .. Respondent

¶11

Appeal under Section 55 of the Indian Divorce Act, against the fair and decreetal order, dated 28.02.2014, passed in I.D.O.P.No.189 of 2012 by the learned District Judge, Nagercoil.

¶12

For Appellant : Mr.M.R.Sreenivasan For Respondent : Mr.C.K.M.Appaji

¶13

JUDGMENT

¶14

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed against the fair and decretal order, dated 28.02.2014, passed in I.D.O.P.No.189 of 2012, by the learned District Judge, Nagercoil.

¶15

The appellant is the husband and the respondent is the wife. The marriage between the appellant and the respondent was solemnized on 26.02.2001. Two female children were born on 29.12.2002 and 26.12.2007 in the wedlock. Due to dispute, both were living separately. The appellant/husband filed I.D.O.P.No.189 of 2012 before the District Court, Nagercoil, for dissolution of marriage. The learned District Judge, Nagercoil, dismissed the said I.D.O.P. on 28.02.2014. Against the said dismissal order, the present civil miscellaneous appeal is filed.

¶16

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, both the parties along with their respective counsels are present and submitted that both the appellant and the respondent entered into a compromise for divorce by mutual consent and to that effect they have filed a compromise memo, dated 22.03.2016.

¶17

The compromise memo dated 22.03.2016 is taken on record and the civil miscellaneous appeal is disposed of in terms of joint compromise memo, dated 22.03.2016. There shall be a Decree of divorce, dissolving the marriage between the parties that took

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

¶20

place on 26.02.2001, in terms of the Joint Memo of Compromise, dated 22.03.2016. The Joint Memo of Compromise, dated 22.03.2016, shall form part of the Decree. No costs.

¶21

Sd/Assistant Registrar (CS-I) /True Copy/

¶22

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶23

¶24

The District Judge, Nagercoil.

¶25

+1cc to Mr.C.K.M.Appaji, Advocate Sr.No. 18835 +1cc to M.R.Srinivasan Advocate Sr.No. 18728

¶26

smn2

¶27

JA/DB/SAR-III/2.06.16/2P-4C

¶28

C.M.A.(MD)No.579 of 2014

¶29

04.04.2016

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Yesubakthan v. Jaila Rani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yesubakthan v. Jaila Rani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Nisath Vs S.Shajila

Sivagami Vs Sankar

M/S. United India Insurance Vs B. Bahalamurugan

D.Thiagarajan Vs S.Anuradha

R.Jeyachandran Vs S.Parasamal

The Branch Manager, Vs Thirupurasundari