S.Nisath v. S.Shajila
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed an un-opposed Civil Miscellaneous Appeal prerogative writ petition seeking permission to withdraw filed under Section 47 Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, as withdrawn
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was denied as the appeal was withdrawn.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.04.2016
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI
S.Shajila .. Respondent
Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 47 Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, against the order, dated 24.10.2013, passed in G.W.O.P.No.120 of 2012 on the file of the District Court, Nagercoil.
For Appellant : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai For Respondent : Mr.G.R.Swaminathan
JUDGEMENT
The learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal and to that effect he has also sent a letter dated 30.03.2016 to the Registry to post this appeal for withdrawal.
- Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous is closed.
Sd/-
Parties & counsel
- respondent
S.Shajila
Coram
V.M.Velumani
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court