G.Janaki Ammal v. v.G.Balashanmugam
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal under Section 96 CPC withdrawn; appeal dismissed with costs. Connected miscellaneous petition also dismissed.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 13-07-2016
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.KALAIYARASAN
A.S.No.335 of 2011
1. G. Janaki Ammal
2. R. Sivajothi
3. Alamelu .. Appellants/Defendants
Vs.
V.G. Balashanmugam ..Respondent/Plaintiffs
Appeal suit under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code to
set aside the judgment and decree of the learned District Judge,
Karaikal in O.S.No.7 of 2010 dated 17-02-2011 and consequently,
dismiss the O.S.No.7 of 2010 with costs and pass orders.
For Appellants : Mr. T. Sai Krishnan
for M/s. Sai Bharath and Ilan
JUDGMENT
As per letter dated 02-07-2016 given by the learned counsel
appearing for the appellant, this Appeal is dismissed as
withdrawn. No costs. The connected M.P.No.1 of 2011 is also
dismissed.
glp
Sd/-
Asst.Registrar
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
TO
Parties & counsel
- appellant
G. Janaki Ammal
- appellant
R. Sivajothi
- appellant
Alamelu
- respondent
V.G. Balashanmugam
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court