Kodaikanal Township v. the Palani Hills Conservation
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2008 The Hon`ble The CHIEF JUSTICE and
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPMP No.897 of 2008
The Hon`ble The CHIEF JUSTICE and
The Hon`ble Mr Justice T. S. SIVAGNANAM
KODAIKANAL TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE, C/O. COLLECTOR, DINDIGUL DIST. DINDIGUL Vs THE PALANI HILLS CONSERVATION COUNCIL, REP.BY ITS VICE PRESIDENT MR. NAVREZ MODY, KODAIKANAL-2 and 4 others.
These miscellaneous petitions have been posted before the Court, as only the records of these petitions are available and are kept pending and the main bundles are not available. Thus, if any one is interested in prosecuting the petition, bundles will have to be reconstructed.
2.In the matters where the parties are represented, steps be taken to reconstruct the records within two (2) months from today, without insisting on separate petition being filed for re-construction purpose.
3.In case of matters where no one is present, we presume that there is no interest left in prosecuting the petition and we close those petitions, with liberty to the counsels to revive it, if they re-construct the records and are desirous of prosecuting the matter.
[CJ] [T S S J]
26/06/2015
SRA
KODAIKANAL TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE
THE PALANI HILLS CONSERVATION COUNCIL
CHIEF JUSTICE
T. S. SIVAGNANAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court