Allowed

K. Mahendar, v. the State Throug the

Madras HC27 Mar 2015WP(MD)/4477/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench issued a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to grant permission for the Aadal Paadal dance programme during a specific festival period, subject to stringent conditions regarding law and order, decency, and communal harmony.

What did the court decide?

Directing the respondent to issue permission for the 'Aadal Paadal' programme between 03.04.2015 and 05.04.2015 subject to conditions prohibiting obscenity, political/religious content, and ensuring l

K. Mahendar, Vs the State Throug the — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.03.2015 CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE S.TAMILVANAN and

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.S.RAVI

¶5

W.P.(MD)No.4477 of 2015

¶6

K.Mahendar ... Petitioner

¶7

Vs.

¶8

The Inspector of Police, Elumalai Police Sation, Madurai District. ... Respondent

¶9

PRAYER: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to give protection and permission to the Aadal Paadal dance programme during the festival in Arulmigu Samaya Karuppu Samy Kovil on 03.04.2015 to 05.04.2015.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.K.R.Laxman

¶11

For Respondents : Mr.M.Alagathevan, Spl.G.P.

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

(Order of this Court was made by S.TAMILVANAN,J.)

¶14

This Writ petition has been filed invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking an order in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to give protection and permission to the Aadal Paadal dance programme during the festival in Arulmigu Samaya Karuppu Samy Kovil on 03.04.2015 to 05.04.2015.

¶15

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

¶16

3.Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that Aadal Paadal programme is being conducted by the villagers during the above said festival period. In this connection, a representation was given to the respondent, however, the same was not considered by the respondent so far and hence, the petitioner is before this Court with this Writ petition. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further submitted that as the aforesaid festival is celebrated in a peaceful manner by the villagers, there will be no untoward incident by the people of the village.

¶17

4.Mr.M.Alagathevan, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, on instructions, would submit that the permission sought for by the petitioner may be granted with stringent conditions for maintaining law and order and also to avoid any untoward incident https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ during performance of such programme.

¶18

¶19

5.Having considered the facts and circumstances and the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, we are of the view that necessary permission shall be granted to the petitioner and his villagers to conduct 'Aadal Paadal' programme in the aforesaid Temple with reasonable conditions.

¶20

6.Accordingly, the Writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:

¶21

(a)The 'Aadal Paadal' dance programme in connection with the temple festival at Arulmigu Samaya Karuppu Samy Kovil be held from 03.04.2015 to 05.04.2015 between 6.00 p.m. and 10.30 p.m.

¶22

(b)There should not be any kind of obscene dance or vulgar dialogues during the performance, by anyone of the participants;

¶23

(c)Double meaning songs should not be played so as to spoil the minds of students and the youth.

¶24

(d)No dance or songs, touching upon any political party or religion community or caste be played.

¶25

(e)No flex boards in support of any political party or religious leader be erected.

¶26

(f)The function should not affect either religious or communal harmony and shall be conducted without any discrimination based on caste.

¶27

(g)If there is any violation of any one of the conditions imposed, the concerned police officer is at liberty to take necessary action, as per law and stop such performance; and

¶28

(h)Similarly, the police is empowered to stop the dance programme, if it exceeds beyond the permitted time.

¶29

(i)The second respondent is directed to issue necessary permission, incorporating the above conditions. No order as to costs.

¶30

Sd/-

¶31

Assistant Registrar(Writs)

¶32

/TRUE COPY/

¶33

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶34

¶35

The Inspector of Police, Elumalai Police Sation, Madurai District.

¶36

+1cc to Special Govt.Pleader SR.No.15578

¶37

W.P.(MD)No.4477 of 2015 27.03.2015

¶38

nbj PA/31.03.2015/2P/3C

¶39

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K. Mahendar, v. the State Throug the

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K. Mahendar, v. the State Throug the

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Nagaraj Vs the Secretary

P.Chidambaram, Vs the Tamil Nadu State Transport

K.R. Vellaichamy Vs the Superintendent of Police

S.Karunanidhi, Vs the District Collector

C. Rajasekaran Vs the Superintendent of Police

K.Sakthivel Vs the Supdt. of Police