Disposed

S.Karunanidhi, v. the District Collector

Madras HC27 Mar 2015WP(MD)/4010/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking a mandatory writ directing the Tahsildar to consider a representation and issue a Most Backward Class community certificate to the petitioner's daughter. The Special Government Pleader raised no objection, and the High Court directed the respondent to act within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the second respondent to consider the representation dated 29.01.2015 and pass appropriate orders within four weeks to issue a community certificate.

S.Karunanidhi, Vs the District Collector — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.03.2015 CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE S.TAMILVANAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.S.RAVI

¶4

W.P.(MD)No.4010 of 2015

S.Karunanidhi

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai

¶9

2.The Tahsildar, Vadipatti Taluk, Madurai District.

¶10

... Respondents

¶11

PRAYER: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2^nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 29.01.2015 and to issue community certificate of Hindu Piranmalai Kallar of Most Backward Class to the petitioner's daughter namely, SRAVANYA.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Rathinavel Pandian For Respondents : Mr.N.Manoharan, Spl.G.P.

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

(Order of this Court was made by S.TAMILVANAN,J.)

¶15

This Writ petition has been filed invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking an order in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 29.01.2015 and to issue community certificate of Hindu Piranmalai Kallar of Most Backward Class to the petitioner's daughter namely, Sravanya.

¶16

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

¶17

3.Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner drew the attention of this Court to the community certificate issued in favour of the petitioner and other supporting materials.

¶18

4.Learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents has no objection in directing the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 29.01.2015 and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ pass appropriate orders in issuing community certificate in favour of the petitioner's daughter Sravanya.

¶19

¶20

5.On the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the second respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 29.01.2015 and pass appropriate orders according to law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶21

6.The Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs.

¶22

/True Copy/

¶23

Sd/Assistant Registrar(RTI) Sub-Assistant Registrar

¶24

¶25

1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai 2.The Tahsildar, Vadipatti Taluk, Madurai District.

¶26

+One cc to the Special Government Pleader, SR.No.15580 +One cc to Mr.D.Rathinavel, Advocate, SR.No.15376 nbj RL/5 c- 7/4/2015

¶27

W.P.(MD)No.4010 of 2015

¶28

27.03.2015

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Karunanidhi, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Karunanidhi, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Nagaraj Vs the Secretary

P.Chidambaram, Vs the Tamil Nadu State Transport

K.R. Vellaichamy Vs the Superintendent of Police

K. Mahendar, Vs the State Throug the

C. Rajasekaran Vs the Superintendent of Police

K.Sakthivel Vs the Supdt. of Police