Petitioner sought writ to initiate action against third respondent for permit violation. Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 11.03.2015
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P(MD).No.3127 of 2015
S.Muthulakshmi ...Petitioner
Vs.
Regional Transport Office,
Palani, Dindigul District.
Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first and second respondents to initiate action against the third respondent by considering the petitioner's representation dated 11.01.2015 for violation of condition of the permit.
For Petitioner : Ms.R.Shankar Ganesh
For Respondents : Mr.R.Anandharaj
Government Advocate for R1&R2
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(AE)
/True Copy/
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To
Regional Transport Office, Palani, Dindigul District. +One cc to Mr.R.Shankar Ganesh, Advocate, SR.No.11618 pjl
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ RL/4 c- 25/3/2015
S. Muthulakshmi
The Regional Transport Authority, Dindigul
The Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office, Palani, Dindigul District
A. Rajkumar
K. Ravichandrababu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
