Disposed

V. Varatharaja Perumal v. the Government of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC16 Feb 2015WP(MD)/1919/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court dismisses writ petitions without adjudicating merits, directing respondent authorities to consider petitioners representations regarding service seniority and notional promotion and pass orders within twelve weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directing respondents to consider petitioners' representations regarding service seniority and notional promotion and pass orders within twelve weeks.

V. Varatharaja Perumal Vs the Government of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 16.02.2015

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU

¶6

W.P.(MD)Nos.1919 to 1923 of 2015

¶7

W.P.(MD)No.1919 of 2015:

¶8

V.Varatharaja Perumal ...Petitioner

¶9

-Vs-

¶10

1.The Government of Tamil Nadu., Rep.by its Secretary to Home Dept., Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.

¶11

2.The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004.

¶12

3.The Superintendent of Police, Virudhungar District.

¶13

...Respondents

¶14

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent Nos.2 and 3 to revise and regularize the service seniority and give the notional promotion with monetary benefits equal to the post of SubInspector of Police Rank to the petitioner on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 26.02.2010.

¶15

W.P.(MD)No.1920 of 2015: S.Kamaludeen ...Petitioner

¶16

-Vs-

¶17

1.The Government of Tamil Nadu., Rep.by its Secretary to Home Dept., Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.

¶18

2.The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004.

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District. ...Respondents

¶20

¶21

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent Nos.2 and 3 to implement the third respondent endorsement contents dated 05.09.2014 about the regularization of the service seniority and the notional promotion with monetary benefits equal to the post of SubInspector of Police Rank to the petitioner.

¶22

W.P.(MD)No.1921 of 2015:

R.Muthu Krishnan

...Petitioner

-Vs-

1.The Government of Tamil Nadu., Rep.by its Secretary to Home Dept., Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004. 3.The Superintendent of Police, Virudhungar District. ...Respondents

¶27

¶28

W.P.(MD)No.1922 of 2015: A.Alavudeen ...Petitioner

¶29

-Vs-

¶30

1.The Government of Tamil Nadu., Rep.by its Secretary to Home Dept., Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004.

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District. ...Respondents

¶32

¶33

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent Nos.2 and 3 to implement the third respondent endorsement contends dated 18.08.2014 about the regularization of the service seniority and the notional promotion with monetary benefits equal to the post of SubInspector of Police Rank to the petitioner.

¶34

W.P.(MD)No.1923 of 2015:

¶35

R.Kasirajan ...Petitioner

¶36

-Vs-

¶37

1.The Government of Tamil Nadu., Rep.by its Secretary to Home Dept., Fort.St.George, Chennai-600 009.

¶38

2.The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004.

¶39

3.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District. ...Respondents

¶40

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent Nos.2 and 3 to implement the third respondent endorsement contents dated 26.06.2014 about the regularization of the service seniority and the notional promotion with monetary benefits equal to the post of SubInspector of Police Rank to the petitioner.

¶41

For Petitioners in all WPs :Mr.A.Rajaram For Respondent in all WPs :Mr.S.Kumar Addl.Govt.Pleader.

¶42

COMMON ORDER

¶43

Mr.S.Kumar, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents.

¶44

By consent of both the parties, the main writ petitions are taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission.

¶45

Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

¶46

¶47

In all these writ petitions the petitioners are seeking for a

¶48

Mandamus directing the concerned respondent to regularize their service seniority and give notional promotion with monetary benefits equal to the post of Sub Inspector of Police. It appears that in all these cases, the petitioners have already made individual representations and therefore it is for the respondents 2 and 3 to consider those representations of the petitioners and pass orders on the same.

¶49

Accordingly, these writ petitions are disposed of without expressing any view on the merits and the contentions raised by the petitioners, only with a direction to the respondents 2 and 3 to consider those representations of the petitioners respectively and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

Sd/

Assistant Registrar

/True copy/

sub Assistant Registrar(c.s)

¶54

¶55

1.The Secretary to Home Dept., Government of Tamil Nadu., Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.

¶56

2.The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004.

¶57

3.The Superintendent of Police, Virudhungar District.

¶58

4.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

¶59

+1cc to Mr. M.Rajaram, Advocate in SR.No. 6982

¶60

+1cc to Special Government Pleader in SR.No. 7319.

¶61

TS/24.02.2015/4P-7C

¶62

W.P.(MD)Nos.1919 to 1923 of 2015

¶63

16.02.2015

¶64

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

V. Varatharaja Perumal v. the Government of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V. Varatharaja Perumal v. the Government of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M. Balasubramanian, Vs the Managing Director

P.Ramar Vs the Tamilnadu State Transport

S.Periyasamy Vs the Secretary to Government

S.Gurusamy Vs the Managing Director

A.Sundarraj Vs the Secretary to Govt.

G.Vasantha Vs the District Forest Officer