Disposed

A.B.S. Antow, v. the Chairman

Madras HC11 Feb 2015WP(MD)/1474/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought a writ directing the State level Environment Impact Assessment Authority to issue a clearance certificate for quarry operations. The court directed the Authority to pass appropriate orders within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the first respondent to pass appropriate orders within four weeks and to direct the second respondent to issue transport permit.

A.B.S. Antow, Vs the Chairman — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.02.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRA BAABU

¶3

W.P.(MD) No.1474 of 2015

... Petitioner

A.B.S.Antow

vs.

1.The Chairman

State level Environment Impact Assessment Authority, 3^rd floor, Panagal Maligai No.1 Jeenis Road, Saidapet, Chennai.

¶9

2.The District Collector Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil.

¶10

3.The Assistant Director Geology and Mining, Kanyakumari District Nagercoil ...Respondents

¶11

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus to direct the 1^st respondent herein to issue clearance certificate to the petitioner for carrying quarry operation in 0.08.0 hectares land in SF No.8/2 (P) of Kappiyarai Village, Kalkulam Taluk, Kanyakumari District.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.E.V.N.Siva

¶13

For Respondents : Mr.R.Anandharaj Government Advocate

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

The petitioner seeks for a direction directing the first respondent to issue clearance certificate to the petitioner for carrying quarry operation in 0.08.0 hectares land in SF No.8/2 (P) of Kappiyarai Village, Kalkulam Taluk, Kanyakumari District.

¶16

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that similar writ petitions filed before this Court in W.P.(MD) No.20926 of 2014 etc., batch were disposed of on 22.12.2014 directing the first respondent therein to pass appropriate orders within four weeks and further directing the 2^nd respondent to issue transfer permit to the respective petitioners therein and that the said order has been complied with by the respondents therein. He also brought this Court's attention to the similar order passed in W.P.(MD) No.354 and 390 of 2015 dated 12.01.2015.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.It is stated that the Assistant Director of Geology and Mining, Kanyakumari District, who is the third respondent herein, has given approval for quarrying rough stone to the petitioner. The said order

¶18

¶19

dated 27.01.2015 is also enclosed in the typed set of papers. The similar order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD) No.20926 of 2014 dated 22.12.2014 is extracted hereinder:

¶20

“Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents, who on instructions given by Assistant Director (Geology and Mining) submitted that the proposal given by the Assistant Director (Geology and Mining) has already been forwarded a proposal to the first respondent and on the basis of the proposal, he seeks four weeks time for passing orders by the first respondent.

¶21

2.Recording the said submission, these writ petitions

¶22

are disposed of by directing the first respondent to pass appropriate orders on the basis of the recommendation of the third respondent, within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The second respondent is hereby directed to issue transport permit to the petitioner. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.”

¶23

Considering the fact that the final order has been passed in the above writ petitions and that the same has been complied with by the official respondents, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to pass appropriate orders on the application filed by the respective petitioners seeking for clearance certificate based on the approval order passed by the Assistant Director (Geology and Mining) in respect of petitioner. The first respondent shall pass such an order within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The 2^nd respondent is directed to issue transport permit to the petitioner in the light of the approval already granted by the Assistant Director (Geology and Mining) in respect of the petitioner. No costs.

¶24

Sd/-

¶25

Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶26

/TRUE COPY/

¶27

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶28

¶29

1.The Chairman

¶30

State level Environment Impact Assessment Authority, 3^rd floor, Panagal Maligai,No.1 Jeenis Road, Saidapet, Chennai.

¶31

2.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil.

¶32

3.The Assistant Director

¶33

Geology and Mining, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil +1cc to Mr.E.V.N.Siva,Advocate, SR.No.6267

¶34

+1cc to Special Govt.Pleader SR.No.6767

¶35

W.P.(MD) No.1474 of 2015

¶36

11.02.2015

¶37

RR https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶38

PA/13.02.15/2P/6C (IT)

A.B.S. Antow, v. the Chairman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.B.S. Antow, v. the Chairman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D.Muniasamy Vs the Principal Secretary

K.Subbiah Pandi Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

R.Haridoss, Vs the State of Tamilnadu

S. Moses Vs the Joint Director

P.Subramani Vs the Registrar of Co-Operative

S. Thirukkumar Vs the Government of Tamilnadu