Allowed

K.Subbiah Pandi v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Madras HC10 Feb 2015WP(MD)/16410/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants relief to a petitioner seeking the release of a seized tractor allegedly involved in illicit sand transport. The High Court directed the police to release the vehicle upon payment of a security deposit and execution of an undertaking, subject to conditions regarding ownership proof and potential violations within three months.

What did the court decide?

Directing respondents to release the seized tractor bearing Registration No.TN 50 Y 5659 to the petitioner upon deposit of Rs.25,000 and compliance with specified conditions.

K.Subbiah Pandi Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.02.2015 CORAM

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRA BAABU

¶4

W.P.(MD) No.16410 of 2014

K.Subbiah Pandi

... Petitioner

vs.

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District

¶9

2.The Inspector of Police, Nalattinpudur Police Station, Kovilpatti Thoothukudi District ...Respondents

¶10

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus to direct the 2^nd respondent to release the petitioner's vehicle Tractor bearing Registration No.TN 50 Y 5659, within the time that may be stipulated by this court.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu For Respondents : Mr.V.Muruganandham Addl. Government Pleader

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

The writ petition is filed for a direction to the 2^nd respondent to release the petitioner's vehicle Tractor bearing Registration No.TN 50 Y 5659.

¶14

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents.

¶15

According to the petitioner, the said vehicle was seized by the 2^nd respondent without there being any cause of action to do so. It is further stated that the said vehicle has not indulged in any unlawful activities.

¶16

A counter has been filed by the first respondent, wherein, it is stated that the said vehicle was indulging in illicit transport of minor mineral sand, which necessitated the authorities to seize the vehicle.

¶17

The learned Additional Government Pleader submitted that penalty proceedings initiated against the petitioner is under process.

¶18

Considering the fact that the vehicle was seized as early as on 22.08.2014 and the same is exposed to sun and rain, thereby diminishing https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ its value, this Court is of the view that the vehicle can be released subject to certain terms and conditions as has been done in similar cases.

¶19

¶20

Accordingly, the respondents are directed to release the said Tractor, bearing Registration No.TN-50 Y 5659, seized by the 2^nd respondent on 22.08.2014, to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:-

¶21

“i) The petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/-

¶22

(Rupees Twenty five Thousand Only) with the first respondent within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶23

ii)On deposit of the said amount, the respondents are directed to release the vehicle on the following conditions:-

¶24

(a)The petitioner shall produce before the respondents the relevant documents to establish his ownership of the vehicle;

¶25

(b)He shall execute an affidavit giving undertaking that he will not alienate the vehicle till the completion of the proceedings, if any, initiated against him;

¶26

iii) The respondents are at liberty to initiate proceeding against the petitioner, if the petitioner has violated any of the provisions of the Acts or Rules. But the proceeding has to be taken, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If no action is taken against the petitioner, within the said period, the amount deposited by him shall be returned to him; and

¶27

(iv)The petitioner shall abide by the orders passed by the authority concerned or the respondents.

¶28

With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶29

Sd/-

¶30

Assistant Registrar(RTI)

¶31

\True copy\

¶32

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶33

¶34

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District

¶35

2.The Inspector of Police, Nalattinpudur Police Station, Kovilpatti Thoothukudi District

¶36

+1 CC TO M/S.G.THALAIMUTHARASU, ADVOCATES SR.NO.6390

¶37

+1 CC TO THE SPL.GOVT.PLEADER SR.NO.6240

¶38

W.P.(MD) No.16410 of 2014 10.02.2015

¶39

¶40

NA/19/02/2015/P2/5C

¶41

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Subbiah Pandi v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Subbiah Pandi v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D.Joseph Dhanapaul Vs the Director of School

R. Chelladurai, Vs the Director

P. Anandaraman Vs Recovery Officer

D.Muniasamy Vs the Principal Secretary

R.Haridoss, Vs the State of Tamilnadu

M. Shylaja, Vs the Director of Collegiate