In this writ petition seeking mandamus for payment of pension and commutation, the Madurai Bench disposed of the matter by directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation on merits within two months.
Directive for respondent to consider petitioner's representation on merits within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.07.2015 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.(MD)No.12988 of 2015 S.Karunanithi ... Petitioner Vs.
The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.
Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District. ... Respondent PRAYER: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to pay commutation and pension for two months ie., September & October 2013 on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 28.05.2015. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Karunanithi For Respondent : Mr.D.Sivaraman Takes notice
PRAYER: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to pay commutation and pension for two months ie., September & October 2013 on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 28.05.2015.
O R D E R
The petitioner seeks for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to pay commutation and pension for two months ie., September & October 2013 on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 28.05.2015.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that it would suffice, if the representation of the petitioner is disposed of, on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
4.In view of the limited scope of the prayer, the respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 28.05.2015 on merits and in accordance with law, after giving notice to the petitioner, and pass appropriate orders within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
5.With the above direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. Sd/Assistant Registrar
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.
W.P.(MD)No.12988 of 2015 24.07.2015
NS/21.08.2015 :1p/2c
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petitioner is entitled to a mandate directing the respondent to consider his representation for pension and commutation within a specified time.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. Karunanithi
Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd.
S. Vaidyanathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
