Dismissed

S.R. Arul Raja Selvan, v. Government of India

Madras HC23 Jul 2015WP(MD)/12710/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged the inaction of respondents regarding his appointment as Care Taker and Associate NCC Officer. The court directed respondents to pass orders on merits within two months and disposed of the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Respondents 4 to 6 directed to pass appropriate orders on the proposal to approve the petitioner's appointment as Care Taker and Associate NCC Officer within two months.

S.R. Arul Raja Selvan, Vs Government of India — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.07.2015 CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.(MD)No.12710 of 2015

¶4

S.R.Arul Raja Selvan

¶5

... Petitioner Vs.

¶6

1.Government of India, Rep by its Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Defence, South Block, New Delhi 110 011.

¶7

2.Directorate of National Cadet Cops, Rep by its Director General NCC Directorate, R.K.Puram,New Delhi.

¶8

3.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Secretary, Department of Youth Welfare and Sports Development, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.

¶9

4.NCC Directorate of Tamil Nadu, Puducherry & Andaman Nicobar, Rep by its Deputy Director General, NCC Directorate of TN, P & AN, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.

¶10

5.The office of NCC Group Head Quarters, Rep by its Group Commonder, NCC Group HQ at Madurai, 86, PT, Rajan Road, Madurai 625 002.

¶11

6.The 11 Tamil Nadu Battalion NCC, Rep by its Commonding Officer, 49/4, Vellalar Street, Nagercoil 629 001.

¶12

7.Nesamony Memorial Christian College,Marthandam, Rep by its Correspondent and Secretary, Marthandam, Kanyakumari District 629 165.

¶13

8.The Principal, Nesamony Memorial Christian College, Marthandam, Kanyakumari District 629 165. ... Respondents

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

¶16

PRAYER:

¶17

Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 4 to 6 to approve the appointment of the petitioner as Care Taker and as Associate NCC Officer of 3/11 NCC (Army) company through direct commission on the basis of the proposal sent by the 8^th respondent vide his letter No.CCM/2014 368, dated 31.05.2014.

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Brijesh Kishore For Respondents : Mr.R.Anandharaj, G.A. 3 to 6

¶19

The petitioner seeks for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 4 to 6 to approve the appointment of the petitioner as Care Taker and as Associate NCC Officer of 3/11 NCC (Army) company through direct commission on the basis of the proposal sent by the 8^th respondent vide letter No.CCM/2014 368, dated 31.05.2014.

¶20

Mr.R.Anandraj, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents 3 to 6. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

¶21

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that proposal has been sent by the 8^th respondent for approval of appointment of the petitioner for the above said post. He would further submit that it would suffice, the respondents 4 to 6 may be directed to pass appropriate orders on the proposal sent by the 8^th respondent, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶22

4.In view of the limited scope of the prayer, the respondents 4 to 6 are directed to pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, on the proposal sent by the 8^th respondent to approve the appointment of the petitioner as Care Taker and as Associate NCC Officer of 3/11 NCC (Army), within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶23

5.With the above direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

¶24

Sd/Assistant Registrar (Crl.Side)

¶25

/True Copy/

¶26

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

¶29

¶30

THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 011.

¶31

THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, DIRECTORATE OF NATIONAL CADET CORPS, NCC DIRECTORATE, R.K.PURAM, NEW DELHI.

¶32

THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPT. OF YOUTH WELFARE AND SPORTS DEVELOPMENT, FORT ST.GEORGE, CHENNAI-9.

¶33

THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR GENERAL, NCC DIRECTORATE OF TAMILNADU PUDUCHERRY & ANDAMAN NICOBAR, NCC DIRECTORATE OF TN, P&AN, FSG, CHENNAI-9

¶34

THE GROUP COMMANDER, THE OFFICE OF NCC GROUP HEAD QUARTERS, MADURAI, NCC GROUP HQ AT MADURAI, 86 PT RAJAN ROAD, MADURAI-625002. 6. THE COMMONDING OFFICER, THE II TAMILNADU BATTALION NCC, 49/1, VELLALAR STREET, NAGERCOIL-629 001. + 1 CC TO MR.B.BRIJESH KISHORE, ADVOCATE SR NO.41322 + 1 CC TO SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER SR NO.41118 NBJ TE: 6/08/2015: 3P/9C

¶35

W.P.(MD)No.12710 of 2015 23.07.2015

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.R. Arul Raja Selvan, v. Government of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.R. Arul Raja Selvan, v. Government of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B. Subaitha Begum, Vs the Director of Collegiate

S. Mariappan, Vs the District Collector

R.K.Venkatraman Vs the Secretary to Government

R.Rajendran, Vs the Districtg Revenue Officer

R. Gurusamy, Vs the Tamil Nadu Newsprint

S.Sampath Vs the Director General of Police