Dismissed

K.Kannathasan v. the Registrar of Cooperative

Madras HC21 Jul 2015WP(MD)/12412/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking a direction to dispose of a representation. The writ was dismissed as maintainability was doubtful based on a larger bench judgment regarding cooperative society disputes.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner's prayer to direct respondents to dispose of representation expeditiously was denied.

K.Kannathasan Vs the Registrar of Cooperative — Cooperative Societies | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.07.2015 CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.(MD)No.12412 of 2015

K.Kannathasan

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Poonthamallie,

¶8

Kilpauk,

¶9

Chennai 600 010.

¶10

2.The Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Madurai Region,

¶11

Ground Floor Ganga Apartments, 13-A, Lady Dock College Road, Madurai.

¶12

3.The Deputy Registrar / Managing Director,

¶13

A.1254 Theni Agricultural Producers Cooperative Marketing Society Ltd., No.661, Peeriyakulam Road,

¶14

Theni District 625 531.

¶15

... Respondents

¶16

PRAYER:

¶17

Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 25.06.2015 as expeditiously as possible within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Anand For Respondents : Mr.R.Anandraj, G.A.

¶19

In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks for a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 25.06.2015 as expeditiously as possible.

¶20

2.This Court is not inclined to go into the merits of the case, as the maintainability of the Writ petition itself is doubtful, in the light of the larger bench judgment in (K.Marappan Vs. The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Namakkal Circle, Namakkal-636 001 and another) reported in (2006 (4) CTC 689). Hence, the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

¶23

3.However, the dismissal of the writ petition will not prevent the petitioner from availing such remedy, as are open to him in law. If any dispute is raised by the petitioner before the Appellate Authority, it shall be decided in accordance with law.

¶24

Sd/Assistant Registrar(AS)

¶25

/True copy/

¶26

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶27

¶28

1.The Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Poonthamallie,

¶29

Kilpauk, Chennai 600 010.

¶30

2.The Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Madurai Region,

¶31

Ground Floor Ganga Apartments,

¶32

13-A, Lady Dock College Road, Madurai.

¶33

3.The Deputy Registrar / Managing Director,

¶34

A.1254 Theni Agricultural Producers Cooperative Marketing Society Ltd., No.661, Peeriyakulam Road, Theni District 625 531.

¶35

+1CC TO SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER IN SR NO.40060

¶36

nbj:

¶37

sdr:01.08.2015 :2p/5c W.P.(MD)No.12412 of 2015 21.07.2015

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Kannathasan v. the Registrar of Cooperative

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Kannathasan v. the Registrar of Cooperative

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bonfiglioli Transmissions P Lt Vs The Assistant Commissioner(Ct)

T.V. Devarajan Vs the Director General of

Christal Mary, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

Minor Anudharani Repd. by Vs the Secretary

K.Kasinathan Vs the Regional Manager

Dr.G. Reegan, Vs State of Tamil Nadu