Disposed

Karuppasamy v. the District Collector

Madras HC15 Jul 2015WP(MD)/12100/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a writ petition seeking a mandamus order to remove an encroachment in a pathway. The High Court directed the District Collector to dispose of the petitioner's representation on merits within two months after giving notice to the petitioner, private respondents encroachers, and interested parties, without adjudicating the merits itself at this stage.

What did the court decide?

District Collector to pass appropriate orders on petitioner's representation on merits within two months after giving notice to relevant parties.

Karuppasamy Vs the District Collector — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 15.07.2015

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE.R.MAHADEVAN

¶6

W.P(MD).No.12100 of 2015

¶7

Karuppasamy

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

1.The District Collector, Dindigul District.

¶10

2.The Tahsildar,

¶11

Palani Taluk,Dindigul District.

¶12

3.The President,

¶13

Kothaimangamal Village Panchayat, Palani Taluk, Dindigul District.

¶14

4.Chinnadurai

¶15

5.Ramesh

¶16

6.Senthil

¶17

... Respondents

¶18

This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to remove the encroachment made by the fourth to sixth respondents in pathway in S.F.No.35/2A1 to the extent of 15 feet width and 448 feet length towards eastern to the west situated at Chinnagounden Valasu, Kothaimangalam Village, Palani Taluk Dindigul District.

¶19

¶20

ORDER

¶21

The petitioner has come forward with this Writ Petition praying for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to remove the encroachment made by the fourth to sixth respondents in pathway in S.F.No.35/2A1 to the extent of 15 feet width and 448 feet length towards eastern to the west situated at Chinnagounden Valasu, Kothaimangalam Village, Palani Taluk Dindigul District. Making such prayer, he has made a representation to the official respondents. Since the said representation went unheard of, the petitioner is https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ before this Court for the relief stated supra.

¶22

¶23

Mr.TR.Janardhanam, learned Addl.Govt.Pleader takes notice for the official respondents.

¶24

By consent, this Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

¶25

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that it would be suffice if the representation of the petitioner is disposed of, by the official respondents, on merits and in accordance with law, within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶26

The learned Addl.Govt.Pleader appearing for the official respondents would submit that the representation of the petitioner will be considered in accordance with law.

¶27

In view of the above, without going into the merits of the claim made by the petitioner in this Writ Petition, the first respondent is directed to pass appropriate orders on the representation of the petitioner, dated 29.06.2015, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving notice to the petitioner, the private respondents herein as well as any of the interested parties, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to enclose a copy of this order along with a copy of the representation already sent to the respondents, for proper follow up.

¶28

With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

¶29

Sd/-

¶30

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(Per.Admn)

¶31

/ TRUE COPY /

¶32

SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶33

¶34

1.The District Collector, Dindigul District. 2.The Tahsildar, Palani Taluk, Dindigul District. 3.The President, Kothaimangamal Village Panchayat, Palani Taluk,Dindigul District.

¶35

+1 C.C.To Mr.R.Jegadeeswaran, Advocate, CCSR 38661 +1 C.C.To Spl. G.P.-CCSR 39359

¶36

ssm

¶37

SH:27.07.2015:P2/6C

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶39

W.P(MD).No.12100 of 2015 15.07.2015

Karuppasamy v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karuppasamy v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ahamadha Vs the Tahsildar

M/S Vasantham Agencies, Vs the Chief General Manager

M.Rajalakshmi Vs the Sub Registrar

King Universe Matriculation Vs the Registrar

R. Aayirakkal, Vs the Revenue Divisional

Yowan Vs the District Collector