Disposed

King Universe Matriculation v. the Registrar

Madras HC15 Jul 2015WP(MD)/12099/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition filed by a school seeking a mandamus to direct the University Registrar and District Collector to shift a constituent college from the petitioner's campus. The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation on merits within six weeks after issuing notice. The petition was disposed of pending final orders.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to pass appropriate orders on the representation dated 18.06.2015 on merits and in accordance with law within six weeks after giving notice.

King Universe Matriculation Vs the Registrar — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED :15.07.2015

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

¶6

W.P(MD).No.12099 of 2015

¶7

King Universe Matriculation Higher Secondary School,

¶8

rep.by its Correspondent, Mr.Raja Muthukumar, S.F.No.471/2, Main Road, Kumanthapuram, Kadayanallur, Tirunelveli District. ... Petitioner

¶9

¶10

1.The Registrar, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.

¶11

2.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. ...Respondents

¶12

This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to shift the premises of the constituent College from the petitioner's school campus in the light of the petitioner's representation dated 18.06.2015.

¶13

For petitioner : Mr.R.Murali For respondents -1 : Mr.M.Mahaboob Athif for M/s.Ajmal Associates

¶14

For Respondent – 2 : Mrs.Bharathi,

Government Advocate

ORDER

The petitioner has come forward with this Writ Petition praying for a Writ of Mandamus to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 18.06.2015. By the said representation, the petitioner has requested the respondents herein to shift the premises of the constituent College from the petitioner's premises.

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

¶21

Mr.M.Mahaboob Athif, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the first respondent and Mr.S.Chandrasekar, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the second respondent.

¶22

By consent, this Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

¶23

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that since the premises in question is required for the petitioner's school itself, they have made a number of representations to vacate the premises, still, it is unheard of by the respondents resulting in filing the present Writ Petition.

¶24

The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the first respondent as well as the learned Government Advocate appearing for the second respondent were put on notice.

¶25

In view of the above, without going into the merits of the claim made by the petitioner in this Writ Petition, the respondents herein are directed to pass appropriate orders on the representation of the petitioner, dated 18.06.2015, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving notice to the petitioner as well as the interested parties, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶26

With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

¶27

Sd/-

¶28

Assistant Registrar(RTI)

¶29

/True Copy/

¶30

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶32

¶33

¶34

1.The Registrar, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.

¶35

2.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

¶36

+1cc to M/s Ajmal Advocate in Sr No.38983 +1cc to Special Government Pleader in Sr No.39369

¶37

ssm

¶38

RJ 27.07.2015 3P/5C

¶39

W.P(MD).No.12099 of 2015 15.07.2015

¶40

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

King Universe Matriculation v. the Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

King Universe Matriculation v. the Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ahamadha Vs the Tahsildar

M/S Vasantham Agencies, Vs the Chief General Manager

M.Rajalakshmi Vs the Sub Registrar

Karuppasamy Vs the District Collector

R. Aayirakkal, Vs the Revenue Divisional

Yowan Vs the District Collector