Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus against several Chennai Corporation authorities. Counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the concerned Authority. The Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the concerned Authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 26.03.2015
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH
and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
W.P.No.8751 of 2015
N.Murali ...Petitioner
vs.
1 The Member Secretary
Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority
No.1 Gandhi Irwin Road Egmore Chennai-8.
2 The Commissioner
Corporation of Chennai,
Rippon Buildings
Chennai-3.
3 The Regional Deputy
Commissioner (Central) Corporation of
Chennai, Second Cross Street,
Pulla Avenue, Shenoy Nagar Chennai-30.
4 The Executive Engineer
(Enforcement Cell) Corporation of Chennai
Second Cross Street, Pulla Avenue Shenoy
Nagar Chennai-30.
5 The Executive Engineer
Corporation of Chennai Zone IX (Teynampet)
Division-117 No.4, 4th Cross Street
Lakeview Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-34.
6 The Assistant Engineer
(Enforcement Cell) Corporation of Chennai
Second Cross Street, Pulla Avenue,
Shenoy Nagar, Chennai-30. ...Respondents
Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the third fourth and sixth respondents to consider and pass orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 27.01.2015 by affording opportunity to all concerned.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Kannan Kumar For R1 : Mr.Rajasrinivas For R2 to R6 : Mr.K.Soundararajan ORDER (Order of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.) Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the above petition with liberty to approach the concerned Authority. He has also made an endorsement in the petition to that effect. 2. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ga To 1 The Member Secretary Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority No.1 Gandhi Irwin Road Egmore Chennai-8. 2 The Commissioner Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Buildings Chennai-3.
3 The Regional Deputy
Commissioner (Central) Corporation of
Chennai, Second Cross Street,
Pulla Avenue, Shenoy Nagar Chennai-30.
4 The Executive Engineer
(Enforcement Cell) Corporation of Chennai
Second Cross Street, Pulla Avenue Shenoy
Nagar Chennai-30.
5 The Executive Engineer
Corporation of Chennai Zone IX (Teynampet)
Division-117 No.4, 4th Cross Street
Lakeview Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-34.
6 The Assistant Engineer
(Enforcement Cell) Corporation of Chennai
Second Cross Street, Pulla Avenue,
Shenoy Nagar, Chennai-30.
1 CC to Mr.K.Soundararajan, Advocate SR.No. 17094
1 CC to the Government Pleader, SR.No. 16971
W.P.No.8751 of 2015
VGI (CO)
PSI (08.04.2015)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to the issuance of a writ of mandamus against the respondents for considering a representation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
N. Murali
The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority
The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai
The Regional Deputy Commissioner (Central), Corporation of Chennai
The Executive Engineer (Enforcement Cell), Corporation of Chennai
The Executive Engineer, Corporation of Chennai Zone IX (Teynampet)
M.M. Sundresh
R. Mahadevan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
