Disposed

D.Suresh Babu v. The State of Tamilnadu

Madras HC26 Mar 2015WP/8616/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a directive to the authorities to take control of a Tirukoil. Directing the Joint Commissioner to consider the petitioner's representation and pass appropriate orders after a hearing within eight weeks, the petition was disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Joint Commissioner to consider the representation dated 17.12.2014, afford an opportunity of hearing, and pass appropriate orders within eight weeks.

D.Suresh Babu Vs The State of Tamilnadu — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

Dated : 26.03.2015

¶3

Coram :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH and

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

¶6

W.P.No.8616 of 2015

¶7

D.Suresh Babu .. Petitioner vs. 1 The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by the Secretary to Government Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department Secretariat Fort St. George Kamarajar Salai Chennai. 2 The Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department Nungambakkam Chennai-600 034. 3 The Joint Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department Balasundaram Salai Coimbatore641 018. 4 M.Muthukumarasamy Trustee A/m.Kavia KaliyammanTirukoil Koilpalayam Coimbatore Taluk-641 107. .. Respondents

¶8

Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the 1^st 2^nd and 3^rd respondent to consider the petitioner representation dated 17.12.2014 for taking appropriate action to take direct control of the Kavaya Kaliyamman Tirukovil, Kovilpallayam, Coimbatore Taluk.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr. R. Amardeep For Respondents : Mr.S.T.S.Murthy for R1 to R3

¶10

ORDER

¶11

(Order of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.)

¶12

The petitioner, being an association involved in spiritual activities for the growth of Hindu Religion, made a complaint to the third respondent on 17.12.2014 bringing to his knowledge about the alleged irregularities said to have been committed by the fourth respondent, the Trustee of the Kavia Kaliyamman Tirukoil. As no action was forthcoming, the present writ petition has been filed. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

Taking into consideration that the representation of the petitioner dated 17.12.2014 is pending consideration with respondent No.3, without going into the merits of the case, a direction is issued to the said authority to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 17.12.2014 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as the respondents, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶14

The writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs.

¶15

Sd/Assistant Registrar

¶16

//True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar

¶17

ga To 1. The Secretary to Government Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department Secretariat Fort St. George Kamarajar Salai Chennai. 2 The Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department Nungambakkam Chennai-600 034. 3 The Joint Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department Balasundaram Salai Coimbatore- 641 018.

¶18

1 cc to M/s. Tamizh Law firm, Advocate SR.17733 + 1 cc Government Pleader Sr.17428 BUR(CO) EU 07.04.2015 W.P.No.8616 of 2015

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

D.Suresh Babu v. The State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D.Suresh Babu v. The State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Umapathy, Vs The Government of Tamilnadu

B.Stalin Vs The District Collector

S.Gopalakrishnan, Vs The Principal District Judge

N.Murali Vs The Member Secretary

J.Daniel Jesudass Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

M/S.Orange Retail Finance Vs Malini Kalidoss