Disposed

A.Vennila, W/O. R.Adhi v. the District Collector

Madras HC8 Oct 2015WP/7656/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ under Article 226 seeking issuance of patta for vacant land based on a representation from 2012. The court directed the 1st respondent to consider the representation and pass appropriate orders within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 3.10.2012 and pass appropriate orders within eight weeks.

A.Vennila, W/O. R.Adhi Vs the District Collector — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 08.10.2015

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH

W.P.NO.7656 OF 2014

Mrs.A.Vennila

... Petitioner

Vs.

The District Collector, The District Collectorate, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri

¶10

The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Harur, Dharmapuri District,

¶11

The Tahsildar, Harur Taluk, Harur, Dharmapuri District. ... Respondents

¶12

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for the relief of issuance of writ of mandamus to direct the 1^st respondent to direct the 3^rd respondent to issue a patta to the vacant land to the extent of 3.70 Acres bearing S.No.41 at K.Agraharam village, Thiruvanapatti Post, Harur Taluk, Dharmapuri District as per Assignment D Patta issued in favour of late Mari and their possession for the last 40 years based on the petitioner's representation dated 3.10.2012 for issuance of patta to the vacant land to the extent of 3.70 Acres bearing S.No.41 at K.Agraharam village, Thiruvanapatti Post, Harur Taluk, Dharmapuri District.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kumaradevan

¶14

For Respondents: Mr.R.A.S.Senthilvel,AGP

¶15

ORDER

¶16

The petitioner made representation on 3.10.2012 to the respondents to the effect that she is entitled to be given a patta for the land to the extent of 3.70 Acres bearing S.No.41 at K.Agraharam village, Thiruvanapatti Post, Harur Taluk, Dharmapuri District in pursuant to the sale effected in her favour from the legal heirs of deceased Ex.serviceman by name Mari. As the said

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

representation has not been considered by passing appropriate orders, the present writ petition is filed.

¶19

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

¶20

Taking into consideration of the pendency of the representation dated 3.10.2012 made by the petitioner, a direction is issued to the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on the same within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order either by himself or by directing his subordinate officer to do so. The petitioner is also directed to furnish a copy of the representation dated 3.10.2012 to the respondents within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order along with a copy of this order.

¶21

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
s/d-
Assistant Registrar(CS-III)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
Copy to:
1. The District Collector,
The District Collectorate,
Dharmapuri District,
Dharmapuri
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
O/o.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Harur, Dharmapuri District,
3. The Tahsildar,
Harur Taluk,
Harur,
Dharmapuri District.
+ 1 cc to Mr.S.Kumaradevan, Advocate SR 55002
+ 1 cc to Govt.Pleader SR 55109
sv(co)
prk12/10
W.P.NO.7656 OF 2014

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

A.Vennila, W/O. R.Adhi v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Vennila, W/O. R.Adhi v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Pachimuthu, Vs the Director of Elementary of

The Commissioner Vs M. Venkadasubbu

N.Devarajan Vs the District Registrar

L.M.Shah, Vs the Deputy Collector (Revenue)

L.M.Shah, Vs the Deputy Collector (Revenue)

A.L.Shah Vs the Deputy Collector (Revenue)