Allowed

L.M.Shah, v. the Deputy Collector (Revenue)

Madras HC8 Oct 2015WP/29712/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court held that a registered sale deed cannot be withheld indefinitely. It directed the release of the document within four weeks subject to conditions, including endorsing dues and pendency, while reserving the respondent's right to pursue recovery proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Direction to release the registered sale deed (Doc No.3030 of 2001) within four weeks with endorsements regarding dues and pendency.

L.M.Shah, Vs the Deputy Collector (Revenue) — Property and Title | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 08.10.2015

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH

¶5

W.P.NO.29712 OF 2013 AND M.P.NO.1 OF 2013

¶6

L.M.Shah ... Petitioner
Vs.

¶7

The Deputy Collector (Revenue) North, Government of Pondicherry, Pondicherry,

¶8

The Sub-Collector (Revenue) North, Government of Pondicherry, Pondicherry.

¶9

The Sub-Registrar,
Oulgaret, Pondicherry. ... Respondents

¶10

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for the relief of issuance of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to release the petitioner's original sale deed dated 20.8.2001 registered as Document No.3030 of 2001 on the file of the 3rd respondent forthwith by considering the representation dated 09.04.2013.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.Stalin Abhimanyu

¶12

For Respondents: Mr.R.Sridhar,Govt.Advocate

¶13

(Pondicherry)

¶14

ORDER

¶15

The petitioner presented sale deed dated 20.8.2001 and the same was registered as Document No.3030 of 2001 on the file of the 3rd respondent. The petitioner paid the deficit stamp duty after nearly a decade. However, he has not paid the interest. Proceedings have been initiated against the petitioner for nonpayment of the said due. Without challenging the said proceedings, the petitioner has come forward to file this writ petition seeking release of the document registered.

¶16

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner made reliance upon the judgment rendered by this Court in B.Rajappa

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

Vs. The Special Deputy Collector (Stamps), (2002 (3) CTC 544) and submitted that no power lies with the respondents to hold the document after due registration, though conditions can be imposed while releasing it.

¶19

Learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that in view of the pending proceedings, the document of the petitioner was not released. The petitioner admittedly did not challenge the proceedings initiated. On the contrary, what the petitioner wants is return of the document after due registration.

¶20

Admittedly, the document of the petitioner has been registered. In the said judgment relied on by the petitioner, it has been held that once the document is registered, it is bound to be released. Therefore, while the respondents can proceed with the recovery of the dues, the document registered cannot be withheld for ever. Even in the said decision, it has been held that the document can be released with an endorsement indicating about the dues and the pendency of the proceedings apart from other conditions that can be imposed. A condition can also be imposed that the document would continue as charge for the dues payable.

¶21

Considering the above, a direction is hereby issued to the respondents to release the document of the petitioner bearing Document No.3030 of 2001 within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, subject to the conditions that can be imposed including those indicate above. This order is passed without prejudice to the rights of the respondents to proceed in accordance with law towards recovery of the amount payable by the petitioner in accordance with law. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶22

usk

¶23

-s/dAssistant Registrar(CS-IV)

¶24

True Copy

¶25

Sub-Assistant Registrar

¶26

Copy to:

¶27

The Deputy Collector (Revenue) North,

¶28

Government of Pondicherry,

¶29

Pondicherry,

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶31

The Sub-Collector (Revenue) North, Government of Pondicherry, Pondicherry.

¶32

The Sub-Registrar, Oulgaret, Pondicherry.

¶33

- 1 cc to Govt.Pleader (Pondicherry) SR 55636

¶34

svi(co) prk19/10

¶35

W.P.NO.29712 OF 2013

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

L.M.Shah, v. the Deputy Collector (Revenue)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

L.M.Shah, v. the Deputy Collector (Revenue)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Pachimuthu, Vs the Director of Elementary of

The Commissioner Vs M. Venkadasubbu

N.Devarajan Vs the District Registrar

L.M.Shah, Vs the Deputy Collector (Revenue)

A.L.Shah Vs the Deputy Collector (Revenue)

L.M.Shah, Vs the Deputy Collector (Revenue)